The Paradox of Grace

In “the gospel of the grace of God” we find a striking paradox: God Himself condemning the righteous and justifying the wicked; forsaking the perfect and helping evildoers.

Behold the spotless Lamb on Calvary as He cries, “My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?”  Judas kisses Him in base betrayal; wicked men spit in His face, mock Him, smite Him, scourge Him, crown Him with thorns and nail Him to a tree!  And God, the Judge of all, does nothing to stop them!  Indeed, He Himself unsheathes His sword and smites the one Person in all history who could truly say, “I delight to do Thy will, 0 my God.”

And this is not all, for on the other hand God saves Saul of Tarsus, Christ’s bitterest enemy, “a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious,” his hands dripping, as it were, with the blood of martyrs.  To him God shows “grace…exceeding abundant” and “all longsuffering” (I Tim. 1:13-16).  Indeed, He sends him forth to proclaim openly to all men that:

“To him that worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness” (Rom. 4:5).

How can all this be right?  The answer is that the One who died in agony and disgrace at Calvary was God Himself, manifested in the flesh.  There, at Calvary, God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them” (II Cor. 5:19).  It was the Judge Himself, stepping down from the throne to the cross to represent the sinner and pay for him the full penalty of his sins.

And who will say this is injustice?  Injustice?  It is perfect justice and more.  It is grace!

Under the terms of the Law we find God “showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me and keep My commandments” (Ex. 20:6).  But grace is infinitely more: it is the riches of God’s mercy and love to “the children of disobedience…the children of wrath” (Eph. 2:2-7), paying the penalty for their sins Himself in strictest accord with perfect and infinite righteousness!

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

A Saying That Shouldn’t Go Without Saying

“This is a faithful saying…that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners…” (I Timothy 1:15).

You’ve probably heard the old saying, “Don’t criticize a man until you’ve walked a mile in his shoes.” I once heard a comedian add, “That way when you do criticize him, you’re a mile away, and you’ve got his shoes!”

While this addition makes that a humorous saying, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” is a faithful saying. That means if you’re a sinner needing a Savior, you can depend on the fact that Christ came to save you, no matter who you are or what you’ve done.

Don’t you wish all old sayings were that dependable? They say, “You get what you pay for,” but I don’t have to tell you that sometimes you don’t. But even under God’s kingdom program for Israel, the Lord declared,

“They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick…I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance” (Matthew 9:12,13).

I’m barely old enough to remember when doctors made house calls, and my doctor once came to our home to treat my asthma. Of course, he wouldn’t have come if I hadn’t needed medical attention. Similarly, Christ wouldn’t have come into the world to save sinners if men didn’t need salvation.

But if you’re not saved, and are unwilling to admit you’re a sinner, you’re in trouble, for that would mean that Christ didn’t come to save you! If you’re willing to acknowledge that “all have sinned” (Rom. 3:23), but you think yourself to be pretty godly overall, you’re still in trouble, for “Christ died for the ungodly” (Rom. 5:6). If that forces you to concede you are an ungodly sinner, but you think you and God are still on good terms, you are still in trouble, for you must admit to being among His “enemies” if you want to be “reconciled to God by the death of His Son…” (Rom. 5:10).

But don’t be discouraged, all of this is actually good news! What if Paul had said, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save tall people,” and you are “vertically challenged.” You can’t admit to being tall, but you can admit to being a sinner. Why not admit it right now, and believe that Christ died to pay for your sins, and rose again (I Corinthians 15:3,4). If you’re saved, why not repeat this old saying to someone today! “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” is not a saying that should go without saying!

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Berean Searchlight – June 2017


Free Mail Subscription

For a free subscription to the Berean Searchlight by mail, visit the Berean Searchlight Subscription page.

Subscribe to the Berean Searchlight Monthly Email to receive an email announcement when each issue of the Searchlight is posted online.

Where Do You Find the Words of the Lord Jesus Christ? – 1 Timothy 6:3-5


Summary:

When we try to convince people the words the Lord spoke on earth were to Israel (Mt.15:24), so we should pay more attention to Paul’s words, people often quote Verse 3 to say that even Paul said to consent to the Lord’s words. But the last 5 words of Verse 2 say, “These things teach and exhort.” So when Paul then says not to teach “otherwise,” he means other than what he taught in that epistle.

You see, if you believe in the verbal inspiration of the Bible, you know Paul’s words were the words of the Lord, in all his epistles (IThes.4:2). People sometimes say, “Paul was just a man, so we shouldn’t take his words over the Lord’s,” but Paul says they aren’t despising a man, they are despising God (ITh.4:8), who inspired Paul to write. This is nothing new, the Jews preferred Moses to the Lord (Jo.9:28,29). People are slow to accept a new spokesman from God, prompting the Lord to say Luke 5:39.

But the question is never who spoke God’s words, the question is always who they are spoken to. The Lord spoke to the Jews (Ro.15:8), Paul spoke His words to us Gentiles (Rom.15:16). To teach “otherwise” than Paul was to teach some “other” doctrine (ITim.1:3), and to deny Paul’s words were the Lord’s words is very Corinthian! (IICor.13:2,3).

“Wholesome” words are words that make you whole. The Lord spoke words that made people whole from sickness (Mt.9:22). Today His words through Paul can make us whole from spiritual death when we get saved (Eph.2:1). Then when our spiritual vitality “dies” due to living in sin (Rom.8:13), we don’t need more salvation, we just need more of his wholesome words! That’s what Paul means when he says his doctrine is “according to godliness” (6:3).

Paul’s doctrine can also save us from the ungodliness of false doctrine (II Tim. 2:17,18). It’ll be godly to say the resurrection is past in the Tribulation, but now it is ungodly, so Paul’s doctrine is according to godliness. The only way to be truly godly is to know where you stand in the program of God (II Tim. 2:15).

Saying the resurrection is past takes doctrine from the future and applies it to today, but here Paul is talking about those who took the Law from the past and were applying it to today (ITim.1:7), another dispensational error. Teaching the Law was godly in time past, but not today. It has a form of godliness, but denies grace, the power of godliness (IITim. 3:5). You know he’s talking about the same people because he says to withdraw from both (ITi.6:5; IITi.3:5).

Jews were “proud” of the law (ITim.6:4), and they were the ones teaching the law in Paul’s day (Tit.2:10-14). “Knowing nothing” (v.4) should remind you of I Timothy 1:7. Any time you teach undispensationally it raises questions (v.4 cf.IITim.2:17,18,23). When Paul says the law causes “strifes of words” (6:4) that’s what the law always does (Tit.3:9). When Paul says the Law causes “envy” (6:4), it did in the legalistic Galatians (5:26). “Railings” (6:4) are tauntings that say someone can’t do something (IIChron.32: 17; Mark 15:29), and lawkeepers always say you can’t keep it as well as they can, and rail on you about it (Isa.65:5).

“Perverse” (6:5) comes from “pervert,” something the law does to grace (Gal.1:7). When the Law was part of God’s program, it was taught by men of sound mind, but now by men of “corrupt minds” (6:5cf.Tit. 2:14-16). When Paul says those who teach it are “destitute of the truth,” the Jews felt they were the only ones who had the truth (Gen.24:27) and all other nations were destitute of it. But there’s been a dispensational change. The law was once the truth, but now the Jews desiring to teach it are destitute of the truth.

“Supposing that gain is godliness” is what Paul thought about the things he thought were gain (Phil.3:5-7), that they made him godly. But with these words, Paul is seguing into talking about financial gain, the subject of the rest of this passage. When Jews were godly, they gained that too (Gen.13:2; Deut.8:18). Today they know God isn’t honoring that promise any more, but many Gentiles who think we are spiritual Israel are teaching that in the prosperity movement. The only thing to do with men like that is “withdraw” from them (ITim.6:5).

Some Certainties in Uncertain Times

It is certainly evident that we are living in uncertain economic times. At such times, certain industries fare better than others. For instance, there will always be a need for people to work in the food industry, for people will always need to eat. There will also always be a need for health care workers, since people will also continue to get sick and need health care.

It is equally evident that we are living in uncertain spiritual times. At such times, there will always be a need for Christians who are willing to work to bring the gospel to the lost. There will always be “certain” among the lost who will actively seek salvation (Luke 18:18), but “certain” others will trust in themselves that they are righteous (Luke 18:9), so God’s people will need to reach out to them.

It is also certain that some will continue to oppose Paul’s gospel, “certain” of them opposing it on philosophical grounds (Acts 17:18), “certain” others because they are set in their ways and so naturally resist the new truth that Paul set forth (Acts 15:1).

Who will step up to meet these challenges? In Paul’s day, “a certain disciple… named Timotheus” answered the call (Acts 16:1). How about you, man of God? Why not consider enrolling in our Berean Bible Institute, “that thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed” (Luke 1:4). Then go out and “preach the word” and “do the work of an evangelist” as the Lord would have you do (II Tim. 4:1-5).

When Paul preached in Athens, “certain men clave unto him” (Acts 17:34), just as grace believers have today. But just as “a certain young man named Eutychus” fell asleep when “Paul was long preaching” (Acts 20:9), many long-time grace believers have fallen asleep under the ministry of Pauline teaching. If you fear that describes you, why not wake up and follow the example of “a certain man…named Justus” (Acts 18:7) and “a certain woman named Lydia” (Acts 16:14) who opened their homes to the ministry of Pauline truth and helped establish grace churches in their respective cities.

Many Christians are at a complete loss as to knowing what to do in these uncertain spiritual times, but that doesn’t apply to those who know the certainty of Paul’s gospel. We have the answer to the religious confusion all about us! If you’re not part of the movement that is bringing the solution to these poor confused people, you’re part of the problem.

One thing is sure. “We brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out” (I Tim. 6:7). With that in mind, why not begin today to live with eternity in view?

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

The Motives of Law and Grace

“Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm” (I Timothy 1:7).

Since “we are not under law, but under grace” (Rom. 6:15), what possible motive could someone have to teach the law? Well, in Paul’s day, the men most likely to desire to cling to the law were Jews (Acts 15:1). Speaking of them, Paul told Titus:

“…there are many unruly and vain talkers…of the circumcision…who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake” (Titus 1:10,11).

The thing that these circumcision Jews “ought not” to have been teaching was the law, which they taught for the same reason men teach the law today—because there is money in it. Satan always makes sure that undispensational truth is popular, and teaching what is popular is always a lucrative endeavor!

For instance, in time past, God’s message to Israel was that He was going to use Nebuchadnezzar to conquer the nation to chasten her for her iniquities (Jer. 25:9). But false prophets in Israel were assuring God’s people it would never happen, that they would continue to enjoy peace (Jer. 23:17). Which of those two messages do you think was more popular, and thus more lucrative?

Of course, when Israel was obedient to God’s law, His message to them was a message of peace, but when they rebelled against His law, that message became one dispensation too late. Well, today the law is one dispensation too late, but it is as popular and as profitable as undispensational teaching has always been. People are religious by nature, and the law appeals to their religious “flesh” (Gal. 3:3). And that which appeals to a man’s religious flesh is always going to be as popular and as lucrative a business as that which appeals to his carnal flesh (II Cor. 11:20).

When Paul added that those teachers of the law understood “neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm,” that was a polite way of saying they didn’t know what they were talking about! All because they were one dispensation too late in their teaching. What’s that say about all those “desiring to be teachers of the law” in our own day?

Maybe you are thinking, “If the goal of the law is to get us to love God and our neighbor (I Tim. 1:5), and we’re not under the law, does that mean God doesn’t want us to love God and our neighbor?” Of course He does! But now such loving charity is the goal of a new commandment. You see, when Paul said that “the end of the commandment is charity” (I Tim. 1:5), he wasn’t just referring to the goal of the ten commandments.

Remember, Paul opened this epistle by insisting that he was an apostle “by the commandment of God” (I Tim. 1:1), and in the dispensation of grace, the goal of that commandment is charity out of a pure heart. The goal of Paul’s God-ordained apostleship is to get people saved and loving God and their neighbor, just as it was under the law. The difference is, in this dispensation, “the love of Christ constraineth us” to serve Him (II Cor. 5:14), not the fear of what will happen to us if we disobey Him, as was the case under the law. That’s the motivation of love, not law! That’s the motivation of grace.

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

What To Do If the Yoke’s On You – 1 Timothy 6:1-2


Summary:

A “yoke” (6:1) was a symbol of slavery (Lev.26:13). Since slaves couldn’t change their circumstances, Paul’s advice was was to change how they thought about their circumstances (I Cor. 7:21,22). It’s the secret of life, since oftentimes our circumstances can’t be changed.

Slaves are often told to obey their masters (Eph. 6:5; Col.3: 22; Titus 2:9), but here Paul goes further and tells servants to “count” their masters “worthy” of the honor of their service. You could honor a master with your service with-out counting him worthy of it. But all that did was make a slave miserable, since he had to obey. So Paul told slaves to serve their masters as they served Christ (Eph.6:5,6). If you feel good about serving the Lord, you can feel the same about serving your boss, if you serve him as unto the Lord. We’re about to elect a new boss of our country. We all have to obey him. But if we don’t count him worthy of our obedience, all it will do is make us miserable.

Slaves that didn’t count their masters worthy of their service were more likely to serve poorly, and that would cause God to be blasphemed (6:1). When men don’t serve their bosses well, or women don’t do what God says they should do, God is blasphemed as well (Tit. 2:3-5). When Paul says not serving well would cause God’s doctrine to be blasphemed, he’s talking about the doctrine that said that “there is neither bond nor free” (Gal. 3:27,28). If you were a master who didn’t know anything about the Bible and you read that, you’d think Christianity was all about freeing slaves. And then if your servant was slothful that would confirm his wrong understanding of God’s doctrine.

It would be tempted for believing slaves to despise a believing master who wouldn’t free them, but men were servants for legitimate reasons, such as when a man would run up too much debt and had to work it off, so it wouldn’t be right to free them. Slaves might also resent a believing master if he didn’t give them preferential treatment, but masters were told to give all servants what was “just and equal” (Col. 4:1). This was lest unbelieving slaves resent Christianity when they didn’t get preferential treatment.

A slave might also despise a believing master for the reason Hagar “despised” her mistress when she could do what her mistress couldn’t. When you think you can do your master’s job better than he can, it’s easy to despise him.

The Jews thought they could do the job of leading Israel as well as Moses and Aaron (Num.16:3). But Moses and Aaron didn’t lift themselves up to be leaders as the Jews said, God lifted them. And whoever wins our election, we know that God lifted them up (Rom.13:1). To despise them would be “presumptuous” (II Pe.2:10), i.e., we would be presuming we could govern better. Hagar proved she could do a better job than her master, but when she despised her, her mistress “dealt hardly with her” (Gen.16:6), and the same might happen to us if we despise government.

It is said our leaders aren’t following the constitution, the law of our land, and so aren’t worthy of the honor of our service. But the Law of Moses was the law of the land of Israel, and it said “thou shalt not kill,” and Saul wasn’t honoring it when he was trying to kill David. But David felt bad when he despised him for it (I Sam.24:5,6).

God forbid that we should despise our leaders for not following the law of the land. God is all about order. He has let Satan himself sit on the throne of this planet for 6,000 years, knowing Christ will someday return and fix all our governments. All He asks of us is to do the same, and focus instead on the ministry He’s focusing on.

Masters are “faithful,” full of faith in Christ (Eph.1:1) and “beloved” of the Lord (cf. Rom.1:7; IITh.2:13), and despite their faults masers should be obeyed because they were.

Believing masters were “partakers of the benefit” of having a saved slave. If Onesimus served Paul in Philemon’s stead, he would “benefit” at the Judgment Seat (Phile.1:14). If Onesimus served Philemon, he’d be a partaker of the benefit of a believing slave. But either one would only be so if Onesimus chose to serve his master.

Jangle Bells!

“Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned.

“From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling” (I Timothy 1:5,6).

In football, a player scores a goal when he reaches “the end zone.” God’s “end” or goal in giving the ten commandments was “charity.” That is, His purpose was to get men to love God and their neighbor by telling them how to behave toward God and their neighbor. But some in the Ephesian church that Timothy pastored had swerved from that goal and “turned aside.”

The apostle did not choose that phrase at random, for three times we are told that Israel “turned aside” when they “made them a molten calf” (Ex. 32:8; Deut. 9:12,16). God gave the Jews a Law that said they must make no graven images, and they turned aside from it! So I suspect when Timothy began to preach that “we are not under law, but under grace” (Rom. 6:15) that some in Ephesus claimed, “Timothy is turning aside from the Law.” This prompted Paul to counter by using that same phrase to tell Timothy, “They’re right, we are turning aside from the Law, we’re under grace! (Rom. 6:15). But they’re turning aside from the goal of the Law,” unto something he calls “vain jangling.” So what’s that?

The word “vain” means empty, and “jangling” is an overly loud form of jingling. Jingle bells sound very festive; jangle bells, not so much! Whatever these Ephesians had turned aside to, it was empty, and evidently very jarring. And we don’t have to guess as to what it was, for Paul goes on to say,

“Desiring to be teachers of the law…” (I Timothy 1:7).

Some in Ephesus were turning aside from the goal of the law to focus on the law itself! They were swerving and turning aside from loving charity and focusing on the law that was supposed to produce loving charity. And when the law is taught to members of the Body of Christ who are not under the law, it always leads to the very opposite of loving charity. When some legalists put the Galatians under the law, it caused them to “bite and devour one another” (Gal. 5:15). Interestingly enough, another definition of the word “jangling” is quarreling or bickering. As you know, when men quarrel and bicker it sounds more like jangle bells than jingle bells!

Paul had to write to Titus about the same problem:

“…there are many vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision…” (Titus 1:10).

What do you think those vain talkers of the circumcision were talking about? I’ll give you a hint. The Greek word for “vain talkers” is a form of the same word translated “vain jangling” in our text. Yes, that’s right, the vain talkers in Crete, where Titus was stationed, were talking about the same thing as the vain janglers in Ephesus, the law. The law was once pleasant jingling, but when it is levied on people who are not under the law it becomes vain jangling.

What do you say we all focus on the goal of the law rather than on the law itself? Jangle bells never sound good, but the pleasant jingle bells of love and grace are always in season!

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.