¿Nuestros seres queridos en el cielo nos recuerdan?

“¿Se acuerdan de nosotros nuestros seres queridos en el cielo?”

Sabemos que las personas en el cielo recuerdan sus vidas pasadas por Apocalipsis 6:10. Aquí Juan ve una visión del cielo en la que los santos mártires claman venganza contra aquellos que causaron su “muerte” (v. 9). Sería difícil creer que Dios permitiría que las personas en el cielo tuvieran recuerdos de personas así (cf. Apocalipsis 18:20) y no recuerdos de seres amados.

Además, Abraham llamó al hombre rico en el infierno a “recordar” a Lázaro (Lucas 16:25). Si Dios permite que las personas en el infierno sean atormentadas por los recuerdos de las personas que conocieron durante la vida, sería difícil creer que Él no permitiría que las personas en el cielo sean consoladas por los recuerdos de sus seres queridos.

Finalmente, sabemos que hay reconocimiento en el cielo ya que nuestros cuerpos serán modelados como el cuerpo resucitado del Señor (Filipenses 3:21), y Él solo no era reconocible para Sus amados cuando “sus ojos estaban cerrados” (Lucas 24:16). Además, Pablo sabía que sería consolado al ver a los tesalonicenses en el cielo (I Tesalonicenses 2:19). Bueno, si nuestros seres queridos en el cielo no nos recuerdan ahora, ¿de repente nos reconocerán y recordarán cuando lleguemos al cielo? Parece más natural creer que nuestros amigos, familiares y cónyuges fallecidos se acuerdan de nosotros ahora y ya nos aman con el amor perfecto que nos tendremos unos a otros por toda la eternidad.


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.

Who is Leviathan in Psalm 74:14?

“Who is leviathan, and what does Psalm 74:14 mean?”

“Thou brakest the heads of leviathan in pieces, and gavest
him to be meat to the people inhabiting the wilderness.” (Psalm 74:14)

Elsewhere, God vows to punish “leviathan that crooked serpent” and thereby “slay the dragon” (Isa. 27:1). So leviathan there is “the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil” (Rev. 20:2).

Breaking his heads is an idiom that describes what God did to Satan when He defeated the devil’s army at the Red Sea (Psa. 74:13). Giving him “to be meat to the people in the wilderness” is what God did later to Satan’s giants in Canaan. Joshua told the Jews in the wilderness not to fear them, “for they are bread for us” (Num. 14:9), that is, “We’ll eat them alive!”

Tribulation Jews will hide from the beast in the wilderness (Rev. 12:6,14), and Isaiah 27:1 will assure them that the Lord will defeat him, and he and his host will be meat for them at Armageddon.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Un patrón de sobriedad

Para enseñarle a su hijo adolescente sobre los peligros del alcohol, un padre dejó caer un gusano en un vaso de agua y se movió, como lo hacen los gusanos en tu anzuelo cuando vas a pescar. Pero luego echó otro gusano en el whisky, y rápidamente se enroscó y murió. Él preguntó: “¿Qué te enseña eso, hijo?” El niño respondió: “Si bebo alcohol, no tendré lombrices”.

Hablando de adolescentes así, el apóstol Pablo les dio un consejo que quería que Tito transmitiera a los jóvenes a quienes ministraba. El escribio,

“Exhorta asimismo a los jóvenes a ser sobrios” (Tito 2:6).

Después de exhortar a los ancianos a ser “sobrios” (v. 2) y a las ancianas “así mismo” (v. 3), así como a las mujeres jóvenes (v. 4), Pablo también le dice a Tito que instruya a los jóvenes a ser sobrios “ asimismo” (v. 6). Es obvio por el énfasis de Pablo en la sobriedad aquí que Dios quiere que todo Su pueblo se eleve por encima de la frivolidad del mundo que nos rodea y tome en serio las cosas del Señor.

Por supuesto, el propio Tito era un hombre joven, por lo que no sorprende seguir leyendo y ver a Pablo exhortándolo a liderar el camino en esta importante área:

“Mostrandote en todo por ejemplo de buenas obras…” (Tito 2:7).

La palabra “patrón” es la palabra griega tupos, de donde obtenemos nuestra palabra tipo. Aprendí a escribir en una máquina de escribir que era tan vieja que no tenía que estar enchufada a la pared y tampoco tenía una batería recargable como tu computadora portátil. Lo que sí tenía eran llaves unidas a largos martillos con letras pequeñas grabadas en el extremo. Cuando golpeaba las teclas, y tú tenías que golpearlas, los martillos volaban y golpeaban una cinta de tinta extendida sobre una hoja de papel. Cada golpe de martillo dejaría una impresión en el papel con la forma exacta de la letra en el extremo del martillo.

Entonces, al exhortar a Titus a ser un tupos, le estaba diciendo que fuera la letra pequeña al final del martillo. Le estaba pidiendo que fuera el tipo de joven que te daría la impresión de ser alguien a quien te gustaría modelar tu vida. Pablo había vivido una vida ejemplar como esa, pero estaba a punto de desaparecer de la escena, por lo que instruyó a Tito para que se convirtiera en un modelo de buenas obras para la próxima generación.

Nuestra palabra inglesa “patrón” tiene la misma idea. Cuando era joven, salí con una joven que hacía sus propios vestidos colocando un patrón de papel sobre la tela y cortándola con la forma exacta del patrón. La vida de pastores como Tito debe ser igualmente tan ejemplar que los miembros de su rebaño puedan usarla como modelo de buenas obras.

Y si lo piensa, ese no es un mal consejo para todos los creyentes, no solo para los pastores. Especialmente cuando consideras que Tomás el Incrédulo usó la palabra tupos cuando dijo:

“Si no veo en sus manos la huella de los clavos… no creeré” (Juan 20:25).

Los agujeros en las manos del Señor coincidían exactamente con los clavos que los perforaron. Eso me recuerda cómo nuestros departamentos de policía tienen médicos forenses que pueden determinar si un cuchillo es el arma homicida por la forma de la herida en el cuerpo. Ese es el tipo de patrón que Pablo le estaba diciendo a Tito que fuera, el tipo que coincidiría exactamente con las buenas obras que Pablo presenta en sus epístolas.

Ya sabes, los arrestos a menudo se hacen sobre la base de tales pruebas forenses, arrestos que a menudo conducen a condenas. ¿Puedo preguntar, si lo arrestaron por ser cristiano, habría suficiente evidencia para condenarlo? ¿Tu vida ejemplifica las buenas obras que Dios ha descrito en detalle en Su Palabra correctamente dividida?

Si no, ¿notaste que Tomás el Incrédulo declaró que no creería a menos que viera los tupos de los clavos en las manos del Señor? Puede haber personas que te miren y piensen lo mismo, que no creerán a menos que vean tus manos ocupadas en el tipo de buenas obras en las que Dios quiere que los jóvenes caminen, y el resto de nosotros también. ¿Por qué no empezar hoy?


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.

La discreción es la mejor parte del glamour

Probablemente hayas escuchado el viejo dicho: “La discreción es la mejor parte del valor”. Se dice que esta expresión de Shakespeare significa que el buen juicio es mejor que la valentía temeraria, y la prudencia es preferible al valor descuidado. Ese es un buen consejo, un sabio consejo que muchos soldados ancianos han transmitido a los soldados más jóvenes antes de que se fueran a la guerra. Un consejo sensato como ese asegura que nuestros soldados aprovechen al máximo su tiempo al servicio de nuestro país y hagan que sus vidas cuenten en la batalla para preservar nuestra libertad.

Pero como soldados de la cruz, el Apóstol Pablo nos dice que hay algunas cosas que las cristianas mayores deben transmitir a las cristianas más jóvenes, cosas que él escribió en su epístola a Tito:

“Las ancianas… enseñen a las jóvenes… a ser discretas, castas…” (Tito 2:3-5).

La palabra “discreto” significa prudente, o sabio a la hora de evitar errores. También puede tener la idea de ejercer buen juicio y conocer la mejor manera de lograr un propósito. Después de que José le dijo a Faraón que se avecinaban siete años de hambre, sugirió, “busque Faraón un hombre prudente y sabio, y póngalo sobre la tierra de Egipto” (Gén. 41:33). ¡Era absolutamente crucial que Faraón encontrara a un hombre lo suficientemente sabio como para evitar cometer errores, porque iba a depender de Egipto mantener vivo al mundo conocido durante esos siete años de hambruna! Necesitaban un hombre prudente que pudiera ejercer buen juicio y supiera cómo lograr el propósito de salvar al mundo.

Es igualmente crucial que las jóvenes esposas y madres cristianas sean discretas, lo suficientemente sabias para evitar los errores que pueden destruir un matrimonio y una familia, y lo suficientemente prudentes para ejercer siempre el buen juicio, a fin de lograr el propósito de formar un hogar para sus esposos. y niños. El rey Salomón tuvo mil esposas, y escribió:

“Como joya de oro en el hocico de un cerdo, Así es la mujer hermosa que no tiene discreción” (Proverbios 11:22).

Eso es lo que dijo el hombre más sabio del mundo sobre una bella esposa que era demasiado tonta para aprender a ser discreta. Si eres un hombre joven que busca esposa, es posible que desees tener en cuenta ese proverbio. Y si usted es un esposo que está casado con una esposa discreta, eso es algo por lo que debe agradecer a Dios, especialmente si ella también es “casta”, lo siguiente que Pablo dice que las mujeres mayores deben enseñar a ser a las mujeres jóvenes. La castidad es la pureza del contacto sexual extramatrimonial, e ignorarla es un error que ejerce la forma más alta de mal juicio en el matrimonio, ya que la infidelidad es una de las formas más rápidas de destruir un matrimonio y una familia.

A menos que estés en lo que se llama un “matrimonio abierto”, una unión en la que las parejas se dan permiso mutuamente para hacer trampa. El hecho de que tal término incluso exista muestra cuán bajo ha caído nuestra sociedad en moralidad. Algunas personas muy famosas tienen (o han tenido) matrimonios abiertos, pero si esas personas son sus modelos a seguir en la vida, ¡debe cambiarlos por otros mejores!

Las jóvenes cristianas que buscan ser soldados de la cruz deben querer luchar para preservar sus matrimonios, porque al hacerlo, aprovecharán al máximo su tiempo al servicio del Salvador y harán que sus vidas cuenten para Él. Y dado que la discreción y la castidad son las primeras cosas que Pablo dice que las cristianas mayores deben enseñar a las cristianas jóvenes, sabemos que ser discretas y castas son virtudes fundamentales en las que las esposas de todas las edades deben esforzarse por sobresalir.

Las mujeres buscan ser glamorosas por naturaleza, pero las cristianas deben recordar que la discreción es la mejor parte del glamour, y que no hay nada más atractivo para un esposo que una esposa fiel.


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.

¡Tintineo de Campanas!

“Ahora bien, el fin del mandamiento es la caridad nacida de un corazón puro, de una buena conciencia y de una fe no fingida.

“De la cual algunos, desviándose, se desviaron a vanas palabrerías” (I Timoteo 1:5,6).

En el fútbol, ​​un jugador marca un gol cuando llega a “la zona de anotación”. El “fin” u objetivo de Dios al dar los diez mandamientos fue la “caridad”. Es decir, Su propósito era lograr que los hombres amaran a Dios y al prójimo diciéndoles cómo comportarse con Dios y con el prójimo. Pero algunos en la iglesia de Efeso que pastoreaba Timoteo se habían descarriado de esa meta y se habían “desviado”.

El apóstol no escogió esa frase al azar, porque tres veces se nos dice que Israel “se desvió” cuando “hicieron de ellos un becerro de fundición” (Ex. 32:8; Deut. 9:12,16). Dios les dio a los judíos una Ley que decía que no debían hacer ídolos, ¡y se desviaron de ella! Así que sospecho que cuando Timoteo comenzó a predicar que “no estamos bajo la ley, sino bajo la gracia” (Rom. 6:15), algunos en Éfeso afirmaron: “Timoteo se está apartando de la ley”. Esto hizo que Pablo respondiera usando la misma frase para decirle a Timoteo: “¡Tienen razón, nos estamos apartando de la Ley, estamos bajo la gracia! (Romanos 6:15). Pero se están desviando de la meta de la Ley”, hacia algo que él llama “vanas tonterías”. Entonces, ¿qué es eso?

La palabra “vano” significa vacío, y “estridente” es una forma demasiado ruidosa de “tintineo”. Los cascabeles suenan muy festivos; campanadas estridentes, no tanto! Lo que sea que estos efesios se hayan desviado, estaba vacío y evidentemente muy discordante. Y no tenemos que adivinar qué era, porque Pablo continúa diciendo:

“Queriendo ser maestros de la ley…” (I Timoteo 1:7).

¡Algunos en Éfeso se estaban desviando de la meta de la ley para enfocarse en la ley misma! Estaban descarrilándose y desviándose de amar la caridad y enfocándose en la ley que se suponía debía producir amor caritativo. Y cuando la ley se enseña a los miembros del Cuerpo de Cristo que no están bajo la ley, siempre conduce a lo contrario de amar la caridad. Cuando algunos legalistas pusieron a los gálatas bajo la ley, hizo que se “mordieran y devoraran unos a otros” (Gálatas 5:15). Curiosamente, otra definición de la palabra “discordia” es pelear o discutir. Como saben, cuando los hombres pelean y discuten, ¡suena más como campanadas que como campanillas!

Pablo tuvo que escribirle a Tito sobre el mismo problema:

“…hay muchos vanidosos y engañadores, especialmente los de la circuncisión…” (Tito 1:10).

¿De qué crees que hablaban aquellos vanidosos habladores de la circuncisión? Te daré una pista. La palabra griega para “habladores vanidosos” es una forma de la misma palabra traducida como “vanidoso ruidoso” en nuestro texto. Sí, así es, los charlatanes vanidosos en Creta, donde estaba estacionado Tito, estaban hablando de lo mismo que los charlatanes vanidosos en Éfeso, la ley. La ley fue una vez un tintineo agradable, pero cuando se impone a personas que no están bajo la ley se convierte en un resonar vano.

¿Qué dices si todos nos enfocamos en el objetivo de la ley más que en la ley misma? Los tintineos nunca suenan bien, pero los agradables cascabeles del amor y la gracia siempre están de moda!


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.

¡Se buscan hombres!

Mientras Esdras se preparaba para llevar al pueblo de Dios de regreso a la Tierra Prometida después del cautiverio en Babilonia, tenía suficiente dinero para comprar animales para el sacrificio en el templo recién reconstruido (Esdras 7:11-17), pero no levitas para ofrecerlos (8: 15).

Esto me recuerda la situación en nuestros días. Las iglesias de gracia frecuentemente tienen suficiente dinero para servir al Señor, pero no hay hombres dispuestos a ofrecer sus cuerpos como “sacrificio vivo” a Dios (Rom. 12:1). ¿Serás un hombre así, dispuesto a servirle en el ministerio? Me acuerdo del lamento del Señor a los hombres de Dios en los días de Ezequiel:

“No habéis subido a las brechas, ni habéis hecho vallado para que la casa de Israel esté en la batalla en el día de Jehová” (Ezequiel 13:5).

A medida que los pastores de gracia se jubilan y otros se van a estar con el Señor, siempre habrá vacíos que deben llenarse en el frente de la batalla por la verdad. Si Dios le está hablando a su corazón acerca de defender la causa del evangelio de Pablo, ¿por qué no decir con Isaías: “Aquí estoy; envíame” (Isaías 6:8).


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.

Do We Have the Letter Paul Wrote to the Hebrews?

“2 Peter 3:15 says that Paul wrote a letter to the Hebrews to whom Peter was writing. Do we have that letter in Scripture?”

The letter Paul wrote to Peter’s readers must be part of Scripture, for in speaking of it, and “all” of Paul’s other epistles (v. 16), Peter went on to warn that “they that are unlearned and unstable wrest” those epistles, “as they do also the other Scriptures” (v. 16). So whatever epistle Paul wrote to Peter’s readers, it must be part of the canon of Scripture.

As to what epistle that might be, we know Peter wrote his second epistle to the same people to whom he wrote his first epistle, for in 2 Peter 3:1 he wrote,

“This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you…”

That means 2 Peter is written to “the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia” (1 Pet. 1:1), the same dispersed Jews he addressed in his first epistle. Paul wrote an epistle to people in Galatia, people who would then have circulated it to those other regions.

Of course, Paul wrote his epistle to members of the Body of Christ who lived in Galatia, believers who were looking forward to being raptured to heaven (2 Thes. 4:13-18; Titus 2:13), while Peter wrote to Hebrew kingdom saints who were looking forward to making “an entrance…into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord” (2 Pet.1:11), i.e., the kingdom of heaven on earth. But God expected that the epistles of the New Testament would be circulated after they were received (Col.4:16), so we know that Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians is the letter Peter had in mind in 2 Peter 3:15.

If it be asked what interest the kingdom saints to whom Peter wrote might have in reading Paul’s epistle to members of the Body of Christ, the answer is that they would know that “all Scripture is…profitable” (2 Tim. 3:16) if it is rightly divided (2:15). Because of that, those kingdom saints would read Paul’s epistles with the same interest we show when we teach Peter’s epistles, or other books of the Bible that pertain to Jewish kingdom saints.

2 Peter 3:15 is sometimes said to be a reference to the Book of Hebrews, and this verse is promoted as proof that Paul wrote Hebrews. However, the “salvation” that is the subject of the Book of Hebrews is one that “at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed…by them that heard Him” (Heb. 2:3). The salvation spoken of by Paul in his epistles was part of the mystery of the gospel (Eph. 6:19), a mystery that was not spoken of by the Lord while He was here on earth, nor confirmed by the Hebrews to whom He ministered (Matt. 15:24; Rom. 15:8).


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Los Doce y la Señal de Su Venida

“Si los 12 no sabían que el Señor tenía que morir (Lucas 18:31-34), ¿por qué pidieron la señal de su venida (Mateo 24:3)?”

El Señor les había dicho muchas veces que tendría que morir (Mat. 16:21; 17:22,23; 26:2), pero evidentemente les costaba creer que alguien que podía calmar una tormenta y resucitar a los muertos Él mismo podría morir.

Es tentador decir que finalmente se dieron cuenta, pero horas antes de Su muerte, Pedro trató de evitar que lo arrestaran (Juan 18:10). Incluso después de Su resurrección, algunos de los discípulos indicaron que todavía no sabían que Él tenía que morir cuando lamentaron que Su muerte había hecho añicos sus esperanzas de que Él era su Cristo (Lucas 24:13-21).

Así que creo que aunque no sabían que Él tenía que morir, al menos sabían que Él tenía que irse. A menudo había hablado de dejarlos (Mateo 23:39; Juan 14:2, 3, 28; 16:7), aunque tampoco estaban seguros de lo que quería decir con eso (Juan 16:16-18). Él se había comparado a sí mismo con “un hombre que emprende un largo viaje” (Marcos 13:34-37), así que cuando les resultó difícil creer que pudiera morir, tal vez optaron por creer que simplemente se iría de viaje. Pero incluso los 12 que estaban más cerca de Él no sabían adónde iba (Juan 14:5).

Pero aunque no sabían adónde iba, sabían que vendría otra vez, porque había mencionado Su venida a menudo (Mat. 10:23; 16:27,28; 24:27,30,37,39,44). ; 25:13,31). Esto los llevó a preguntarle: “¿Qué señal habrá de tu venida?” (Mateo 24:3).


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.

Things Didn’t Go As Planned – Acts 13:26-39

 

Summary:

God’s word of salvation always went to Jews in the Old Testament, and even in the New Testament (Acts 3:12,26). God had a plan to save the Gentiles, but it involved saving Israel “first” (Acts 3:26), then using them to save the Gentiles. The Jews were supposed to rise to the occasion by receiving the Lord, and the Gentiles were supposed to be drawn to the brightness of the rising of the entire nation (Isa. 60:1-3). When they fell instead, God introduced His secret plan to reach the Gentiles directly (Acts 113:26) through Israel’s fall, a plan He called the mystery (Rom.11:11,25).

At Pentecost, Peter blamed the Jewish rulers in Jerusalem for not receiving Christ, using the pronoun “ye” a lot (Acts 2:22,23; 3:13,14). But Paul told the Jews in Antioch it wasn’t their fault that their rulers rejected Him, using “they” a lot (Acts 13:27,28). The nation may have rejected Christ, but God was reaching out to individual Jews through Paul.

Those Jews fulfilled Scripture in condemning Him (Acts 13:27), but that doesn’t mean they had to condemn Him. God planned for them to receive Christ and sacrifice Him for their sins instead of animals (Ps.118:26cf.Mt.21:9).

But either way He died, God’s plan also involved raising Christ from the dead (Acts 13:29-33). The word “begotten” (v.33) is usually associated with giving life to a son by fathering him (Gen.5:4), but God begat His Son by giving Him life after He died, making him the “first begotten of the dead” (Rev.1:5). Others in the Bible rose from the dead, but just got their old lives back and died again. Christ was the first to rise with new life, resurrection life (Rom.6:9).

But why did the Father have to tell His Son, “Thou art My Son,” the day He raised Him from the dead? When people rise from the dead, they don’t rise with amnesia, to where they need to be told who they are. But this was the day of the Lord’s bar mitzvah. When He was 12, his earthly bar mitzvah made Him Joseph’s adult son, when his father recognized He was old enough to go into the family carpentry business, which we know He did (Mark 6:3). But He reminded His parents He had another Father and another family business to go into (Lu.2:42-49). That Father was in the quickening business (Jo.5:17-21), and someday the Lord will raise our dead loved ones, and later kingdom believers.

David spoke of his soul being confined in the comfort side of hell while his body was in the grave (Ps.16:810 cf. Lu.16:19-31). He was comforted by the knowledge that God wouldn’t “leave” his soul there, that God would raise him from the dead before his body began to “see corruption” on the fourth day (cf. Jo.11:38,39). But as Peter pointed out, God didn’t raise him. He explained that David was a prophet who was talking about Christ’s resurrection on the third day (Acts 2:25-29). That’s why Paul quotes God as telling His Son, “I will give You the sure mercies of David” (13:34). Paul explained the same thing (13:35-37).

We know that “the law of Moses” that Paul says cannot justify us (13:38,39) was the ten commandments, for James quotes a few of those commandments, and says if you break one, you’ve broken them all (James 2:10,11). And we’ve all broken more than one! But Christ didn’t, and He died a sacrificial death for us. Paul says if we “believe” that He died for us, we can be justified from all things from which we cannot be justified by trying to keep the ten commandments.

Finally, whatever hell you’re going through in life, you can learn to say, as David said in Psalm 16, “The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places.” You just have to remember that God doesn’t intend to leave you in whatever hellish situation you are in, but will deliver you from it at the Rapture. If that doesn’t make you want to “bless the Lord” as David did, you need to study the Scriptures more to learn what a “goodly heritage” you have waiting for you in heaven!

A video of this sermon is available on YouTube: “Things Didn’t Go As Planned” Acts 13:26-39

A Question of Law

A man got lost one day while hot air ballooning. Lowering the balloon to near ground level, he spotted a man and asked him where he was. The man replied, “You’re in a balloon about 30 feet off the ground.” The balloonist replied, “You must be a lawyer. You gave me advice that is completely accurate, yet completely useless!” The lawyer replied, “And you must be a lawyer’s client. You didn’t bring a map so you’re in trouble of your own making, you expect me to provide you with an instant fix, and yet somehow your problem is all my fault!”

When we have questions about the law, we ask them of lawyers. But when it came to questions about the law of Moses, God told Haggai to ask them of Israel’s priests:

“Thus saith the LORD…Ask now the priests concerning the law…” (Hag. 2:11).

Before we consider the question God wanted His prophet to ask the priests, you might be wondering why God didn’t send Haggai to one of the “lawyers” in Israel that we read about in Luke 14:3 and other places. Evidently this class of men had arisen in Israel in New Testament times to interpret the Law of Moses when God’s people had questions concerning it.

But that just shows how far God’s people had drifted from the way He had set things up in Israel. When God gave the law, He put the priests in charge of knowing it, and answering questions about it.

“For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth…” (Mal. 2:7).

If God had wanted a separate class of men called lawyers to answer questions about the law, He would have told His people to establish one—but He didn’t! So it’s no surprise that lawyers in Israel are always cast in a bad light (Matt. 22:35; Luke 10:25, etc.). The Lord said, “the…lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized of him” (Luke 7:30), that is, of John the Baptist (v. 29). That meant that lawyers weren’t saved, for John preached “baptism…for the remission of sins” (Mark 1:4). And that meant that lawyers were likely to give the wrong answers when asked about the law. No wonder the Lord said,

Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered” (Luke 11:52).

Part of the “key of knowledge” that allowed the Jews to enter the kingdom of heaven at that time was knowing they had to be baptized to be saved! When those lawyers refused to be baptized, they failed to enter the kingdom. And when people asked them about John’s baptism, they must have hindered others from entering the kingdom by dissuading them from being baptized as well.

Of course, in our text in Haggai 2, God directed Haggai to the priests to pose His questions about the law, reinforcing the way He had established things.

In and Out of Touch

Now let’s see what God wanted the prophet to ask the priests:

“If one bear holy flesh in the skirt of his garment, and with his skirt do touch bread, or pottage, or wine, or oil, or any meat, shall it be holy? And the priests answered and said, No” (Hag. 2:12).

The “holy flesh” here was the flesh of Israel’s animal sacrifices. Moses said, “the flesh of the ram… wherewith the atonement was made…is holy” (Ex. 29:32-34). But evidently, when men carried their sacrifice to the priest to be offered, it was carried in the skirt of their garment, as in an apron. And God wanted Haggai to ask the priests what would happen if the skirt bearing the sacrifice brushed up against an object on its way to be offered. Would the object it brushed up against also be considered holy. If so, it too would have to be offered to God, for the word holy means “set apart unto the LORD” (Ex. 13:2 cf v. 12), and things set apart unto God belonged to Him.

The reason God asked Haggai to ask the priests this question was to see if they knew that there was a law that covered it. And there was—sort of! Leviticus 6:25,27 says,

“…the sin offering…whatsoever shall touch the flesh thereof shall be holy…”

But you’ll notice that this law didn’t exactly address God’s question. He didn’t ask what would happen if the offering touched something. He asked what would happen if the skirt that was carrying the offering touched something.

But even when the law didn’t clearly spell out the answer to questions about the law, it was still the priest’s job to address them. Speaking of the priests (Ezek. 44:15), God told Ezekiel,

“…they shall teach My people the difference between the holy and profane…in controversy they shall stand in judgment; and they shall judge it according to My judgments…” (Ezek. 44:23,24).

When it came to questions not directly addressed by the Law, controversies would naturally arise. God said that the priest was expected to settle such controversies by extrapolating an answer based on the issues that God did address directly in the law with His “judgments.” This is similar to how judges in our courts must also make decisions based on extrapolations of our laws when an issue is not directly addressed by our civil laws

In Haggai’s day, the priests answered his question correctly (2:12). The objects Haggai asked about were not made holy because they didn’t touch the holy sacrifice itself; they only touched the skirt of the garment that was bearing the sacrifice.

Now before God explains why He wants Haggai to ask the priests this question, He has His prophet submit yet another question to them. Still speaking about the bread, pottage, wine, and oil he mentioned in the previous verse, we read,

“Then said Haggai, If one that is unclean by a dead body touch any of these, shall it be unclean? And the priests answered…It shall be unclean” (Hag. 2:13).

When a man in Israel touched a dead body, he was considered unclean (Num. 19:11). If he in turn touched something else, the rule was: “whatsoever the unclean person toucheth shall be unclean” (v. 22). So the answer to this question was a little more cut and dried, and once again the priests answered it correctly.

And Your Point Is?

Before we read the point God was making for His people in Israel in this passage, think about the point we can make from it for ourselves. When it comes to the kind of people with whom you choose to associate, you might think you can make sinful Christian friends clean up their act by hanging around with them. But what usually happens is the opposite. Their sinful ways end up influencing you instead!

If you think about it, God’s laws reflect the very laws of nature. When mixed together, clean water doesn’t make dirty water clean; dirty water makes clean water dirty. A healthy child can’t make a sick child healthy, but a sick child can make a healthy child sick.

So “touch not the unclean thing” even among believers by choosing your friends wisely (2 Cor. 6:17), for “a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump” (1 Cor. 5:6). Leaven is a type of sin in the Bible because it spreads. You are better off not letting sinful friends help sin get started in your life by remembering that “evil communications corrupt good manners” (1 Cor. 15:33).

Leprosy is another type of sin in the Bible, for it too was highly contagious. But the Lord could heal lepers by touching them because He was God in the flesh. He was able to make virtue flow from Him to the leper, instead of allowing the leprosy of the leper to flow to Him. But the best way for those of us who aren’t God in the flesh to avoid contracting the leprosy of sin is to avoid hanging around sinful “lepers.” You can’t help but rub shoulders with sinful people at work or school (cf. 1 Cor. 5:9,10), but you need to be selective about who you hang around with after work or school.

Now I’m sure God had those points in mind when He gave Israel the laws we are considering. But He had other points in mind in our text here as well, as we see when Haggai gets to the point:

“Then answered Haggai, and said, So is this people, and so is this nation before Me, saith the LORD; and so is every work of their hands; and that which they offer there is unclean” (Hag. 2:14).

Earlier we saw that animal sacrifices were considered holy (Ex. 23:32-34). But Haggai said of his countrymen that the sacrifices they were offering were not holy. Verse 14 says that “that which they offer there is unclean.” Their offerings were made unclean because of their disobedience to God’s commandment.

And we know what specific disobedience God had in mind here, for He had instructed the people of Israel to rebuild the temple, and they had opposed this instruction (Hag. 1:4). That meant they themselves were unclean. Normally, contact with their holy sacrifices would make them clean, as we saw in Leviticus 6:25,27. But the “skirt” of their disobedience came between them (cf. Hag. 2:12), and prevented the holy sacrifice from making them holy.

Skirting the Issue

If you’re not sure what I mean by that, consider the indictment God leveled against His people in Jeremiah 2:34:

“…in thy skirts is found the blood of the souls of the poor innocents…”

The “poor innocents” were the babies the Jews were offering to the false god Molech as human sacrifices in Jeremiah’s day (Jer. 32:35). Their blood wasn’t literally on the skirts of their parents, of course, for when they would “cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech,” fire doesn’t make a baby bleed. God was saying that the blood of the innocents was figuratively on their skirts because of their disobedience to God. This may have been because they carried their babies to sacrifice to Molech in the skirts of their garments, just as they carried their animal sacrifices.

But that was in Jeremiah’s day. In Haggai’s day, the figurative sin on the skirts of God’s people in Israel didn’t involve sacrificing babies, it concerned their failure to rebuild the temple. The holy animal sacrifices they carried to God couldn’t make them holy due to the skirt of that disobedience that came between them and God (cf. Isa. 59:2). So instead of those sacrifices making them clean, their uncleanness was making their sacrifices unclean, the way the unclean man who touched a dead body made everything he touched unclean. This was the point God was making with the questions He had Haggai ask of the priests.

Now when God’s people in Israel were disobedient, He would chasten them with things like bad crops (Lev. 26:18-20), and they were certainly reaping this fate in Haggai’s day (1:5,6). God had warned them, “Thou shalt carry much seed out into the field, and shalt gather but little in” (Deut. 28:38), and Haggai reminded his people that this is what was happening to them when he said, “ye looked for much, and, lo, it came to little” (1:9). The prophet told them to “consider” their ways (1:5) because they just didn’t seem to be making the connection between their disobedience and the chastening they were receiving that the law prescribed for their disobedience. Once they considered the connection, they repented and went to work on the temple (Hag. 1:12-15).

But then some discouragement set in when they saw that the size of the new temple couldn’t compare with the size of Solomon’s temple (2:1-3), and the work on God’s house came to a screeching halt. So Haggai again asked them to “consider” the connection between their sin and the chastening that the law prescribed for their sin, this time begging them:

“And now, I pray you, consider from this day and upward, from before a stone was laid upon a stone in the temple of the LORD:

“Since those days were, when one came to an heap of twenty measures, there were but ten: when one came to the pressfat for to draw out fifty vessels out of the press, there were but twenty” (Hag. 2:15,16).

Doesn’t that sound like they “looked for much, and, lo, it came to little” (1:9)?

If that didn’t jar their memory of God’s covenant with them, and cause them to consider that they were being judged again, Haggai went on to remind them of more of God’s judgments that had befallen them:

“I smote you with blasting and with mildew and with hail in all the labours of your hands; yet ye turned not to Me, saith the LORD” (Hag. 2:17).

Blasting and mildew were more tools in God’s chastening toolbox (Deut. 28:15,22), and hail was normally reserved for His enemies (Ex. 9:18-34; Rev. 16:21). The people of Israel hadn’t considered the connection between these judgments and their sin, but they were about to!

Consider It Done

God’s people must have finally considered that He had brought these judgments on them, and repented in Haggai’s day, for He went on to tell them to “consider now” something different about their chastening, something that would bring them blessing, and not cursing:

“Consider now from this day and upward…even from the day that the foundation of the LORD’s temple was laid, consider it.

“Is the seed yet in the barn? yea, as yet the vine, and the fig tree, and the pomegranate, and the olive tree, hath not brought forth: from this day will I bless you” (Hag. 2:18,19).

There was no fruit on their trees, or seed in their barns, because they had sowed much but taken in little the year before, as we’ve seen. Their crops had yielded barely enough to eat (1:6), with nothing left over to store in the barn to plant the following year. And with no seed to plant, the prognosis for that year’s crop was looking grim.

But here the prophet is calling on the people of Israel to “consider” their chastening for a different reason. Earlier it was to get them to repent by pointing out that God had been faithful to His promise to chasten them if they were disobedient. Here it was to get them to consider that God will now be just as faithful to His promise to bless them, now that they’d repented. That’s why verse 19 ends with a promise of blessing.

This is similar to what the prophet Daniel did after his personal Bible study in the Book of Jeremiah made him realize that Israel’s 70 years in captivity were ending (Dan. 9:1,2). He remembered that God promised if His people confessed their sins after He scattered them among the heathen (Lev. 26:33), He would remember His covenant and forgive them (v. 40-42). So Daniel got busy confessing the sins of his people (v. 3-10), admitting that their sins had caused God to judge them (v. 11), and likewise admitting that in judging them, God was just confirming the covenant He had made with them (v. 12,13). He added that God had been “righteous” to do so (v. 14), for they deserved His judgment (v. 15). Then he wrote,

“O Lord, according to all Thy righteousness…let Thine anger and Thy fury be turned away from Thy city Jerusalem…” (v. 16).

In other words, Daniel was calling on God to be just as righteous, just as faithful to His covenant, to bless His people now that they had repented as He had been when He cursed them when they disobeyed, in accord with all His righteousness.

And that is what God was asking Israel to consider in Haggai’s day: that He would be just as faithful to bless them now that they had repented as He had been to judge them when they disobeyed.

Of course, if you tell a farmer with no seed in the barn to plant that he is going to have a blessed year, he will likely wonder if you’ve been playing football without a helmet. He knows the laws of nature can’t promise that. But Jewish farmers knew that the God of nature could promise that, for His law said He would bless them when they repented, and “with God nothing shall be impossible” (Luke 1:37). And you don’t need a lawyer to tell you that!


You can receive More Minutes With the Bible every week in your email inbox. This list features longer articles, including both original content and articles that have appeared in the Berean Searchlight.


The Sorcerer of Israel – Acts 13:6-12

Summary:

Sorcerers (v.6) were like magicians (cf.Ex.7:10,11). But Bar-jesus is also said to be a “false prophet” (Acts 13:6), so he probably practiced the kind of religious sorcery that “bewitched” the Galatians (Gal.3:1), i.e., false doctrine.

And that’s sad, because he must have had good parents to have named him Bar-jesus. The “bar” part means “son of” (cf. Mark 10:46), and “Jesus” means Jehovah Savior. Lots of parents named their sons “Jesus” (Col.4:11) and Bar-jesus in the hopes their boys would grow up to be true, saved, sons of Jehovah Savior. This one became a false prophet instead.

He was “with” the Roman “deputy” (Acts 13:7). Government officials like him often had sorcerers on their staff as advisers (cf.Dan.2:2). Sergius was probably called “prudent” because he was wise enough to have a Jewish adviser.

The sad thing is: by this time in Acts, Jews like Bar-jesus weren’t supposed to be advising government officials; they were supposed to be government officials, judging the Gentiles in the kingdom as spiritual kings (Rev.5:10). But the Jews lost their right to reign as kings when they rejected their King and the kingdom He came to offer them.

Bar-jesus knew he’d be fired if his boss got saved, so he opposed Paul (Acts 13:8). That makes him a type of the entire nation of Israel (cf.Mt.23:13). He was an unsaved Jew who was trying to keep a Gentile from being saved (cf.I Thes. 2:14-16). The wrath of God fell on Israel when they crucified Christ and stoned His prophet, and God was about to pour out His wrath on them in the Tribulation. Instead, He poured out His grace on Paul and introduced the age of grace. But God’s wrath remains on Israel. They aren’t the people of God; they’re the people of God’s wrath (Isa.10:6).

“Elymas” (Acts 13:8) means wise man, the interpretation of sorcerer. The original word is magos, like the magi that visited the Lord. But while he claimed to be a magi, he rejected the wisdom of a man wiser than Solomon (Mt.12:42).

The Lord probably gave Saul the Gentile name of “Paul” (Acts 13:9) when He sent him to the Gentiles, similar to how He predicted Peter would quit running from the Lord like Jona, and become steady as a rock (Mt.16:17).

When the Lord saved Paul, He filled him with the Spirit in a way that enabled him to blind Elymas (Acts 13:10,11). Elymas was a type of Israel. Israel was full of subtilty, like Satan (Gen.3:1), and “mischief” (Acts 13:10), i.e., evil (cf. Pr.24:8). But they are “beloved” for the sake of the promise of a kingdom that God gave their fathers (Rom.11:28,29).

When Paul said Elymas wouldn’t stop perverting the right ways of the Lord, he was quoting Hosea 14. God told Israel to repent (Hos.14:1,2), promising to give them the kingdom (v.4,9). But only “prudent” men like the deputy ended up walking in God’s ways. God set His eye on Israel “for evil” (Amos 9:4), as Paul set his eye on Elymas in this type of that.

God blinded apostate Israel the way Paul blinded Elymas (Rom.11:7,8). But the calling of God is without repentance (Rom.11:29), so their blindness is only temporary, like Ely-mas’ temporary blindness pictured. It kept Israel from seeing “the sun” for a season (cf. Mal.4:2). The “mist” and “darkness” that fell on Elymas are words used to describe hell (II Pe.2:1,17). Israel has been experiencing hell on earth for 2,000 years, instead of the heaven on earth in the kingdom they could have been experiencing.

Paul must explained to the deputy how Jews are blinded in this age while Gentiles are getting saved, for he was astonished “at the doctrine of the Lord” (Acts 13:12). That doctrine includes how Gentiles are getting saved in spite of Israel (Rom.11:11,12) instead of through her (cf.Isa.60:1-3).

A video of this sermon is available on YouTube: “The Sorcerer of Israel” Acts 13:6-12

¿Estaba Santiago bajo la maldición de Gálatas 1:8-9?

“Si los santos del reino como Santiago continuaron enseñando la ley después de que Pablo recibió el mensaje de la gracia (Hechos 21:20), ¿significa eso que estaban bajo la maldición de Gálatas 1:8,9?

“…Pablo fue…a Santiago; y todos los ancianos….Y…ellos…le dijeron: Ya ves, hermano, cuántos millares de judíos hay que creen; y todos son celosos de la ley” (Hechos 21:18,20).

Evidentemente, Santiago había estado predicando la ley todo el tiempo que Pablo había estado predicando la gracia, e incluso parecía complacido con la cantidad de judíos que la habían recibido. Pero si lees todo el pasaje, no encuentras a Pablo diciendo que fue anatema. Eso se debe a quién fue a quien Santiago le predicó la ley. Lo predicó a los judíos, tal como dijo que lo haría en el Concilio de Jerusalén. Al dar cuenta de ese concilio, Pablo escribió:

“Santiago, Cefas y Juan… nos dieron a mí ya Bernabé las diestras de compañerismo; para que vayamos nosotros a las naciones, y ellos a la circuncisión” (Gálatas 2:9).

Santiago predicó la ley a los judíos a los que accedió a ministrar. ¡Pero también dejó de molestar a los gentiles con la ley, tal como dijo que lo haría en Hechos 15:19!

Es por eso que debe tomar su pluma y subrayar las palabras “a ustedes” en Gálatas 1:8,9. ¡Un hombre solo es maldito si predica la ley a los miembros del Cuerpo de Cristo como los gálatas que no estaban bajo la ley (Rom. 6:15)! Era perfectamente legítimo que Santiago enseñara la ley a los santos del reino judío que quedaban y que fueron salvos bajo la ley antes de que Dios levantara a Pablo para predicar la gracia, porque todavía estaban bajo la ley después. Pero dispensacionalmente es ilegítimo enseñar la ley a los miembros del Cuerpo de Cristo.


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.