The Apostle Paul Goes Straight – Acts 16:11-15

 

Summary:

After God gave Paul a vision telling him to go to Macedonia (v.9,10), he went “straight” there (v.11).  And he must have been examining his method of going from one small town to the next, and realized he’d never reach the world that way, because he went to the “chief city” of Macedonia to preach, knowing the gospel would radiate out from there.  Ever after, he went to big cities like Thessalonica, Corinth and Athens.

History says that people in a Roman “colony” (v.12) were automatic citizens of Rome, so Paul picked the Philippians to talk about our conversation as citizens of heaven (Phil. 3:20).  Two ladies in the church were quarreling (Phil.4:2), and that was no way for citizens of heaven to act!

It wasn’t even a good way for citizens of Rome to act.  If Rome thought you disturbed the peace, they didn’t care who was right or wrong.  They came down on you like a ton of bricks (cf. Acts 21:27-33).  And God doesn’t care who’s right when we disturb the peace with our quarrels in the local church.  He just expects us to restore the peace by forgiving. People think Christianity is a failure because we sing about Christ coming to bring peace on earth—and there is none!  But there will be in the kingdom.  And we can show God’s peace in the meantime amongst ourselves. You have a right to retaliate when wronged, but why not waive your rights like the Lord waived His right to live (IICor.8:9; Phil.2:2-8)?

The Philippians waived rights that Paul didn’t even ask them to waive.  History says people in colonies didn’t have to pay taxes to Rome.  As members of the Body of Christ, the Philippians also had a right not to have to pay the tithe tax to Israel. But the Lord waived His right not to pay it (Mt.27:24-27), and the Philippians did too.  They were the Macedonians who gave the Lord more than ten percent (IICor.8:1-4).

The church in Philippi (Phil.1:1) grew out of this women’s prayer group (Acts 16:13).  They must have been Jewish women, for they were meeting on the sabbath (v.13).  Paul went there instead of going to Philippi’s synagogue because colonies were considered “little Romes,” and the king had ordered all Jews out of Rome (Acts 18:2).  So all the Jewish men left town, and there was no synagogue!

Paul’s first convert was a businesswoman (Acts 16:14) who worshipped Israel’s God by keeping the sabbath.  If she kept God’s other laws, it must mean He had no law against being a working mom with kids (cf.v.15).  God opened her heart (v.15) by opening her understanding of the Scriptures (Isa. 6:10;Lu.24:45), causing her to “attend” to what Paul said (cf. Pr.4:1,20).  But in Bible days, you had to do more than just attend to Scripture to be saved.  You had to be baptized (v.15 cf. Mark 1:4). But there was a dispensational change with Paul, and now salvation is “by the washing of regeneration” (Tit.3:5), and not the washing of water baptism.

So why’d Paul baptize Lydia?  God revealed the new grace program to him gradually (IICor.12:1), so at that time Paul didn’t yet know what he knew when he wrote ICorinthians 1:17).  After he knew it, he never baptized anyone else.

But what had she done that would cause Paul to judge her “faithful” (v.15)?  She believed the new grace message after believing the law—unlike other unsaved Jews Paul encountered.  But if so, why’d she have to “constrain” Paul to stay with her?  He wasn’t afraid of how it would look to stay with a woman, for they wouldn’t have been alone. She had children, and Paul had Silas, Timothy and Luke.  It was because Paul was a Jew, and Jews couldn’t be in a little Rome.  She’d been flying under Rome’s radar, but if she got caught harboring four more Jews, she’d be in big trouble.  Paul knew that, and didn’t want to endanger her, but finally relented.

Women also showed more courage than men when the men forsook the Lord (Mt.26:56), but not the women (27:55).

 

A video of this message is available on YouTube: “The Apostle Paul Goes Straight” Acts 16:11-15

 

A Famous Conversation

Two men were talking one day, and one said, “Last night my wife said to me, ‘You haven’t been listening to a word I’ve said, have you?’ At the time I remember thinking, ‘What a strange way to start a conversation!’”

Speaking of conversations, we’re about to read about a conversation the apostle Paul once had in Israel that was so famous that even the Galatians heard about it over 500 miles away:

“For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews’ religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it” (Gal. 1:13).

As you can see, the conversation Paul is talking about here involved more than just his words. It included his actions as well. Did you know the first word used to define the word “conversation” in older dictionaries is behavior? The way new dictionaries limit the definition to just our words is probably reflective of how men seem to have forgotten that your behavior speaks volumes. An old saying says: “What you’re doing is speaking so loudly, I can’t hear a word you’re saying.” That’s a good adage for Christians to remember, for if you tell people you’re saved, you should act like you’re saved.

But when Paul talked about his conversation “in time past,” he was talking about his behavior before he got saved, his behavior in what he calls “the Jews’ religion.” The Jews’ religion was originally God’s religion. When God gave it to the people of Israel, it was “pure religion and undefiled…” (James 1:27). But it got so defiled by the people of Israel that Paul couldn’t bring himself to call it God’s religion. And before Paul got saved, he was part of that defiling, for his conversation in those days consisted of persecuting the church.

A Search for the Church

When we think of the word “church,” we think of a building. But in the Bible, the word almost always refers to a group of God’s people. Just don’t make the mistake that most Bible teachers make, that of thinking there’s only one church in the Bible, “the church, which is His body…” (Eph. 1:22,23). The Body of Christ is a church, of course. It’s the church of today, the church of the dispensation of grace.

But if it was the only church in the Bible, Paul wouldn’t have had to add “which is His body” in talking about it. The fact that he had to add that qualifying phrase implies there were other churches in the Bible that were not His Body. God has always had a church of people in every dispensation, like the one we read about in Acts 7:37,38:

“…Moses…was in the church in the wilderness….”

The Jews in the wilderness were a church of God’s people, but they weren’t the church which is the Body of Christ. That church began with the conversion of the apostle Paul.

If you think about it, a city is also a group of people. But when you see the word “city” in the Bible, do you assume it is always talking about the same city? Of course not! Then you shouldn’t assume the word church always refers to the same church either.

The church Paul persecuted is what we call the kingdom church. We call it that because of what the Lord told Peter in Matthew 16:18,19:

“…thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church… And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven….”

He was telling Peter that after He died and rose again, He would build a church of people in Israel who would live in the kingdom of heaven on earth, and He’d give Peter the keys to that church. That meant Peter was in charge of who got into that church, just as the keyholder of any building is in charge of who is allowed to enter it.

Now that didn’t mean Peter could say to people, “Okay, I’ll let you in, and you, but not you, and certainly not you!” Is that what you see Peter doing in the Book of Acts? No! The “keys” to the kingdom church included “the key of knowledge” that Israel’s lawyers took away from people, even though they weren’t using it themselves (Luke 11:52). In any dispensation, if you want to get into God’s church, you have to know something. You have to know the gospel being preached in that dispensation, and believe it.

And that’s what you see Peter doing in the Book of Acts: preaching the kingdom gospel, and building the Lord’s church. And that’s the church Paul persecuted, because he didn’t believe the members of that church were God’s people.

Measuring the Immeasurable

Galatians 1:13 adds that Paul persecuted that church “beyond measure.” That phrase always reminds me of the tachometer on my friend’s Harley-Davidson motorcycle. It measures the rpm of his motor, but it only goes up so high. If he exceeds the rpm the tachometer can calculate, he’s pushing the motor beyond measure. We say he’s burying the needle. And that’s how Paul persecuted the kingdom church! He buried the needle, and persecuted it beyond measure.

Verse 13 also says Paul “wasted” the church—and he means he wasted it in the same way the Mafia talks about wasting someone in the movies. They’re talking about murdering someone! That’s just one of many modern phrases that come from the Bible. By Paul’s own admission, he wasted people by persecuting God’s people “unto the death” (Acts 22:4). He had a very dark past.

Maybe you do too. Maybe your past is so dark that you’re afraid if anybody ever found out about it, you could never serve the Lord. If so, I remind you that everybody knew about Paul’s dark past! The Galatians had heard about his conversation, and so had everyone else. But he didn’t let it keep him from serving the Lord, and neither should you.

The reason Paul was reminding the Galatians about his dark past is that he was trying to prove what he had just said in the previous two verses, that his gospel was “not after man” or “of man” (Gal. 1:11,12). Paul’s dark past proved he didn’t get his gospel from men, because all the men who could have given it to him were afraid of him. Right after he got saved, God told a man named Ananias to go see him, and

“Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to Thy saints at Jerusalem” (Acts 9:13).

It’s easy to understand his reluctance here. After all, what the Lord was asking Ananias to do was like asking a Jew to go see Hitler during World War II.

But the point is: Paul’s message was about the Lord Jesus Christ, and nobody who could have given him a message about Christ was about to go anywhere near him! That’s just one of many proofs we have that he didn’t get his gospel from men.

We see proof that he got his message from the Lord instead when Paul started preaching his gospel, and went from being a persecutor to being a persecut-ee, so to speak. Paul went from being a waster of God’s people to being the target of all the other wasters in Israel. He knew in advance that that would happen, and there wasn’t a man on earth who could have made him make that choice. Only God can talk a man into subjecting himself to that kind of lethal persecution.

Cashing in on Killing

Another proof that Paul didn’t get his gospel from men can be seen in the next verse of Galatians 1, where Paul says he

“…profited in the Jews’ religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers” (Gal. 1:14).

Paul was making money in the Jews’ religion, and only God can talk an unsaved religious leader into walking away from his cash flow.

If you’re wondering how Paul profited in the Jews’ religion, the answer might have something to do with how he said he was “zealous.” Take a look at the first appearance of that word in the Bible, a place where it’s used twice:

“Moses said…Slay ye every one his men that were joined unto Baalpeor. And, behold, one… came and brought…a Midianitish woman…in the sight of all… Israel, who were weeping before the door of the tabernacle.…And when Phinehas…saw it, he…took a javelin in his hand; And…thrust both of them through, the man of Israel, and the woman through her belly…And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Phinehas… was zealous…he was zealous for his God” (Num. 25:5-13).

When the Jews balked at killing a woman who was pregnant with a Canaanite’s child, Phinehas was more zealous than his countrymen, for he knew that the demonic seed of the giants she was carrying had to be exterminated.

But if the word “zealous” there is connected with killing in the name of God, well, isn’t that what Paul did before God saved him? The law of first mention says that the first time a word or phrase appears in the Bible it often sets the tone for how it will be used in the rest of the Bible, and the Bible’s first mention of zealous describes the kind of murderous zeal Paul engaged in while thinking he was serving God (John 16:2).

How would he profit from that? Well, what if there was a bounty on the heads of the believers Saul was killing? I can’t prove there was, but it would certainly explain how Paul profited from his zeal.

How would he profit above many of his equals? Perhaps his equals among the wasters in Israel drew the line at killing pregnant women and Paul didn’t. That would fit when verse 14 says he was more “exceedingly” zealous than his equals.

Cashing in on Grieving Widows

But killing in the name of God wasn’t the only way Paul could have profited from being zealous of the traditions of his fathers. Did you ever wonder what Peter meant when he wrote:

“…ye were not redeemed with…silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ…” (1 Pet. 1:18,19).

Who would ever think you could be redeemed from your sins with silver and gold? The answer is found in a money-making religious tradition found among Paul’s religious fathers in Israel, one the Lord scolded them for in Matthew 23:14:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayer….”

When it says they devoured widow’s houses, that was a figure of speech that meant they took all a widow’s money. It’s kind of like when we talk about eating someone out of house and home. Those unscrupulous religious leaders devoured widows’ houses by promising to pray for their dead husbands in exchange for money. Do you have any idea how much wealth Catholic leaders accumulated over the centuries doing that? Catholicism got to be the richest religion in the world, in part by telling widows they’d pray for their husbands to be released from purgatory. The Lord’s words there indicate that this was a tradition that started long before Catholic leaders got hold of it.

But if Paul’s religious fathers in Israel had a softer heart than he had, and didn’t pray too many widows out of house and home, he could have exceeded their zeal when it came to that tradition as well, and profited big time!

And all of this gives us even more proof that Paul’s message was not of men, for only God could have convinced him to leave all that profit behind and start preaching grace, a message that left him nearly broke most of the time. And as we read on in Galatians 1,  Paul begins to tell us how God convinced him to leave those money-making ways behind:

“But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by His grace” (Gal. 1:15).

When Paul says God separated him from his mother’s womb, we have to ask if he was speaking literally or figuratively, for that phrase is used both ways in the Bible. In one instance, it’s used both ways in one verse. Job said,

“Naked came I out of my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither…” (Job 1:21).

Job came out of his mother’s womb literally when he was born. But he said he planned to return to his mother’s womb when he died. If I were Job’s mother, I think I’d have something to say about that. These days you hear a lot about young people who graduate college but can’t find work, so they move back in with their parents. But this would be taking it a bit too far, don’t you think?

Back When the Womb Was a Safe Place to Be

Job is obviously using a figure of speech. Let me ask you: When you die, where do you “return,” as Job said there? God told Adam:

“…dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return” (Gen. 3:19).

When you die, they bury you and you return to the earth. So Job’s mother’s womb was an idiom for what men call “Mother Earth,” interestingly enough.

And Paul was using a similar figure of speech in Galatians 1. Did you notice he didn’t say, “You’ve heard of my conversation in the Jews’ religion, how I profited in the Jews religion, but God separated me from the Jews’ religion”? Instead he said, “You’ve heard of my conversation in the Jews’ religion, how I profited in the Jews religion, but God separated me from my mother’s womb.” He was using a figure of speech. His mother’s womb was the Jews’ religion.

Do you remember which branch of the Jews religion Paul belonged to? He tells us in Acts 23:6, where

“Paul…cried out…I am a Pharisee…”

My old dictionary says the word “Pharisee” comes from Hebrew words meaning “separated one.” The Pharisees considered themselves so holy that they weren’t just separated from the lowly Gentiles as God insisted that all Jews should be. Pharisees thought they were even separate from other Jews who they thought to be less pious, in a class by themselves. Isaiah 65:5 is a prediction of them.

So when Paul says God separated him from his mother’s womb, he’s making a play on words. He’s saying, as it were, “I was a Pharisee, a separated one, but God separated me from the separated ones!”

And Paul had a reason for making this play on words. It was to emphasize how comfortable he was before he got saved and started preaching grace. He was as safe and as comfortable in the Jews’ religion as he was when he was in his mother’s womb. Only God could have caused him to leave such comfort and security. The thought of being separated from his mother’s womb in the Jews’ religion wouldn’t have pleased him before he got saved, but it pleased God!

Now here I should point out that when Paul says God called him by His grace, that proves he wasn’t saved by the kingdom gospel under the kingdom program, as is sometimes taught. God called Paul by grace—the same grace He used to call the Galatians, as we see when Paul told those dear saints,

“I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel” (Gal. 1:6).

Paul was called and saved by the same grace that saved the Galatians, the grace found in the dispensation of grace. But after that, the Galatians went the opposite way that Paul had gone. Paul went from his mother’s womb in the Jews religion of the law to grace. They went from grace to the Jews religion of the law!

And in this dispensation, if you’re heading in the opposite direction from the way Paul went, you’re heading in the wrong direction. If that’s what you’re doing, the only way you’re going to be able to serve the Lord effectually is to turn your ship around, and begin following Paul as he followed Christ.


You can receive More Minutes With the Bible every week in your email inbox. This list features longer articles, including both original content and articles that have appeared in the Berean Searchlight.


Rezar o no rezar: ¡esa es la cuestión!

“No oréis por este pueblo…” (Jeremías 14:11).

“Orad sin cesar” (I Tesalonicenses 5:17).

¡Aquí vamos de nuevo! Otra contradicción en la Palabra de Dios. Una de las muchas incongruencias en las Escrituras que nos hacen preguntarnos cómo servir a Dios cuando Su Palabra da instrucciones contradictorias. Es fácil entender por qué debemos orar sin cesar, pero ¿por qué Dios instruyó a Jeremías a “no orar” por Su pueblo?

Para responder, una mirada rápida al versículo anterior revelará que en los días de Jeremías al pueblo de Dios “le encantaba desviarse” de Él, y “no refrenaban sus pies” (v. 10) de hacerlo. ¡No es de extrañar que su Padre los considerara indignos de las oraciones de Su profeta!

Pero, ¿acaso el pueblo de Dios de hoy no es igual de propenso a desviarse? ¿No cantamos ese viejo himno, “Propenso a vagar, Señor, lo siento, propenso a dejar al Dios que amo”? Entonces, ¿por qué Dios nos dice que oremos sin cesar?

La respuesta yace, como sucede con tanta frecuencia, en “trazar bien la Palabra de verdad” (II Timoteo 2:15). Verá, el pueblo de Dios en los días de Jeremías tenía un contrato con Él, un pacto llamado la Ley de Moisés. Bajo esa Ley, si Su pueblo andaba en contra de Él, Él prometió andar en contra de ellos (Lev. 26:23, 24; 27, 28). Y en los días de Jeremías, el pueblo de Dios no había refrenado sus pies de vagar y alejarse de Él. No le dejaron otra opción a Dios que andar en contra de ellos, y ninguna cantidad de oración de parte de Su profeta podría cambiar lo que Él estaba obligado por contrato a hacer por Su pacto (Jeremías 15:1).

¡Cuán diferentes son las cosas para el pueblo de Dios hoy! ¡No estamos bajo la Ley, estamos bajo la gracia! (Romanos 6:15). En “la dispensación de la gracia de Dios” (Efesios 3:2), Dios no está obligado por el antiguo pacto de la Ley a alejarse de Su pueblo cuando ellos se alejan de Él, Él está obligado por el nuevo pacto de Su gracia “para morar y andar en ellos” y “ser su Dios” sin importar qué (II Cor. 6:16 cf. Jer. 31:33).

¡Así que ahí lo tienes! Otra contradicción en la Palabra de Dios explicada, otro rompecabezas resuelto, dividiendo correctamente la Palabra de verdad.

Pero no se quede sentado allí disfrutando de las riquezas de la gracia de Dios. Ahora que sabes que Dios escuchará tus oraciones por Su pueblo, ¡ora! Cuando veas a tu hermano tropezar en su caminar, ¡ora! Cuando descubras que tú mismo te has desviado de Dios, ¡ora! Dios nunca andará en contra de nosotros, así que ore para que Su pueblo responda a tan maravillosa gracia eligiendo “andar como es digno del Señor, agradándole en todo” (Col. 1:10).


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.


¿Es incorrecto orar las oraciones de Pablo?

“¿Está mal orar las oraciones de Pablo, como los pastores de la gracia a menudo nos dicen que hagamos? ¿Qué pasa con la advertencia del Señor acerca de las ‘vanas repeticiones’?”

La palabra clave en Mateo 6:7 es la palabra “vano”. El Señor mismo se repitió en oración durante Su oración en Getsemani. En Mateo 26, leemos que oró (v. 39), luego oró de nuevo (v. 42), y luego “oró por tercera vez, diciendo las mismas palabras” (v. 44). Pero ciertamente no había nada “vano” en Su repetición.

Mientras respondo a las preguntas bíblicas que recibimos diariamente aquí en BBS, a menudo puedo decir que estoy compartiendo la verdad paulina con alguien que nunca la ha escuchado antes. En tales casos, a menudo hago la oración de Pablo “para que sean alumbrados los ojos de vuestro entendimiento” (Efesios 1:18). Por los creyentes de la gracia que luchan con un aspecto particular de la verdad, por lo general oro para que “permanezcan perfectos y completos en toda la voluntad de Dios” (Col. 4:12). Por los creyentes bien fundados en la gracia, oro para que sean “fuertes en el Señor, y en el poder de su fuerza” (Efesios 6:10), y “fuertes en la gracia que es en Cristo Jesús” (2 Timoteo 2:1). Tampoco hay nada de vano en esas repeticiones.


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.


La sorpresa del Kaiser

En sus comentarios sobre Isaías 57, el Dr. Harry Ironside comparte esta historia:

Hace años, antes de la Primera Guerra Mundial, el profesor Stroeter, un maestro profético muy conocido en Alemania, solía recorrer el país dando conferencias y usando tablas para desplegar las dispensaciones. Sus conferencias atrajeron la atención del emperador alemán, Kaiser Wilhelm, quien a pesar de sus muchas idiosincrasias, era un gran estudiante de la Biblia y solía predicar en la capilla del palacio en muchas ocasiones.

El Kaiser invitó al profesor Stroeter a su palacio para darle una idea de lo que estaba disertando. El profesor fue llevado a la biblioteca y extendió un rollo de sus gráficos sobre la mesa. El Kaiser lo siguió mientras señalaba varias cosas en las dispensaciones hasta la Segunda Venida del Señor. Después de una larga conversación, el Kaiser dijo: “¿Te entiendo bien? ¿Quieres decir que Jesucristo regresará literalmente, y que cuando Él regrese, todos los reinos del mundo serán destruidos y Él establecerá Su reino sobre las ruinas de todos ellos?”

Y el profesor Stroeter dijo: “Exactamente, su majestad…”.

“Oh, no”, dijo el Kaiser, “¡No puedo tener eso! ¡Por qué eso interferiría con todos mis planes!”

No sabemos si el profesor Stroeter entendió las dispensaciones lo suficientemente bien como para haberle expresado al Kaiser que la venida de nuestro Señor para raptar a Su iglesia debe venir antes de la ira de la Tribulación y la Segunda Venida de Cristo (I Tes. 1:10). ; 5:9). De todos modos, ¡qué franca admisión de parte de un hombre que profesaba ser un estudiante y maestro de la Palabra de Dios!

¿Y usted, querido lector? Si no eres salvo, te quedarás atrás cuando el Cuerpo de Cristo sea “arrebatado” para encontrarse con el Señor en el aire (I Tes. 4:17). Si bien los creyentes “estaremos siempre con el Señor” en el cielo, los siete años de la Gran Tribulación que seguirán en la tierra seguramente interferirán con todo lo que ha planeado. ¿Por qué no confiar en el Señor Jesucristo como su Salvador al creer que Su muerte, sepultura y resurrección pagó por todos sus pecados? Entonces usted también puede esperar ser parte de todo lo que el Señor ha planeado para Sus santos.

Pero terminamos preguntando a los cristianos si el Rapto interferirá con sus planes, o será el triunfo de Su gracia en su vida. Cuando se le preguntó a John Wesley qué haría al día siguiente si supiera que el Señor vendría, respondió que se levantaría a su hora habitual, dedicaría tiempo a sus devocionales matutinos programados regularmente y llegaría puntualmente a su primer compromiso de hablar del día. En otras palabras, no tendría que cambiar nada en su vida para prepararse para la venida del Señor. ¡Que esto también sea cierto para nosotros!


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.


¿Es Dios Fiel a Su Palabra?

Al describir las calificaciones de un pastor (Tit. 1:6-8), el apóstol Pablo dejó la más importante para el final, diciendo que un pastor siempre debe ser

“Reteniendo la palabra fiel tal como ha sido enseñada, para que también pueda exhortar con sana doctrina y convencer a los contradictores” (Tito 1:9).

¡Los pastores siempre deben retener la palabra fiel, la Palabra de Dios! El apóstol la llama “la palabra fiel” porque Dios es fiel a cada promesa en Su Libro.

Pero esto es lo que pasa con eso: ¡Él no te hizo todas esas promesas! Puedes orar “el pan nuestro de cada día, dánoslo hoy” todo lo que quieras (Mt. 6:11), pero Dios no será fiel a Su promesa de hacer llover maná sobre ti como lo hizo con Israel en el desierto, y como hará por ellos de nuevo en la Tribulación (Miqueas 7:14, 15 cf. Apocalipsis 12:14). Dios también les prometió que “todo lo que pidiereis en oración, creyendo, lo recibiréis” (Mt. 21:22), pero tampoco cumplirá fielmente esa promesa en la dispensación de la gracia.

Y todavía hay otras promesas en la Biblia que Dios no está cumpliendo hoy. Si el pueblo de Israel era obediente a la Palabra de Dios, Él prometió salvarlos de todas sus tribulaciones (Deut. 4:30), y cumplió fielmente esa promesa (I Sam. 10:19). ¡Pero Dios no te ha hecho esa promesa! Hoy, en la dispensación de la gracia, Dios nos permite pasar por tribulación, y luego es fiel a la promesa que nos da a través del Apóstol Pablo de que “la tribulación produce paciencia” (Rom. 5:3). Pablo es el apóstol de la presente dispensación, así que sabes que Dios será fiel a las promesas que nos hace a través de él.

Y Pablo nos da otras promesas a las que Dios será fiel. Cuando dice, “si por el Espíritu hacéis morir las obras de la carne, viviréis” (Rom. 8:13), quiere decir que al ejecutar las obras pecaminosas de vuestra carne podéis vivir, realmente vivir, vivirlo. arriba, espiritualmente hablando! Si quieres vivir la vida en el plano más alto imaginable, mortifica las obras pecaminosas de tu cuerpo y mira si Dios no es fiel a esa promesa.

Finalmente, Dios será fiel a la promesa que nos hizo a través de Pablo de que “cuando Cristo, nuestra vida, se manifieste, entonces vosotros también seréis manifestados con él en gloria” (Col. 3:4). Esa es una promesa que se cumplirá en el Rapto, la “salvación” (Rom. 13:11) que Dios promete a través de Pablo darnos antes de que se derrame la “ira” de la Tribulación (I Tes. 1:10; 5:9). Cuando llegue ese día, Dios también será fiel a la promesa que nos dio a través de Pablo de “recompensarnos” por nuestro trabajo para Él (I Corintios 3:14). En ese día, verás que Él será igualmente fiel a la promesa que nos hizo a través de Pablo de que “los sufrimientos de este tiempo presente no son dignos de ser comparados con la gloria que se revelará en nosotros” (Rom. 8: 18).

Es esta palabra fiel—la palabra fiel dada a nosotros a través de Pablo—que los pastores deben retener si quieren obedecer el mandato de Pablo de “exhortar y convencer a los contradictorios” (Tit. 1:9), contradictorios como los que insisten que Dios todavía está honrando las promesas que hizo al pueblo de Israel.


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.


The Times, They Are A-changin’ – Acts 16:6-11

 

Summary:

Now that the Bible is complete, the Spirit speaks only through the Book He wrote. But here (v.6), He spoke either audibly or by a vision (cf.v.9).

Two years later, the Spirit did let Paul preach in Asia (19: 10), but not here. This was perhaps due to the way Paul was preaching. He was just going from one small town to the next, and “all Asia” would never hear the Word that way! In Acts 19, Paul taught his disciples in a school and converted some disputers, and they all went out together to preach. So the Spirit forbad him to preach in Asia until he examined his methods and learned how to improve them as an adult son.

That’s how God sees us! Jewish fathers recognized that their boys were sons on the day of their adoption, a day that today they call their bar mitzvah. God adopted you when you got saved (Gal.4:4-6), so He now sees you as an adult son. That means we must make our own decisions, and not wait to hear the voice of our Father guiding us every step of the way.

But you needn’t worry about the lost souls in Asia who died in the two years it took Paul to get there, for they heard the kingdom gospel when Jews who believed it at Pentecost brought it back to them 12 years earlier (Acts 2:9). We know the kingdom gospel was also preached in Bithynia (Acts 16:7) because Peter wrote a letter to saints there (IPe.1:1).

The Spirit told Paul where not to go, but didn’t tell him where to go right away, for He wanted to get Paul used to the idea that things were changing from Him telling Paul where to go to letting him decide as an adult son.

But eventually He told Paul to go to Macedonia (Acts 16:9), the area above Greece where the Mideast meets Europe. He didn’t tell Paul to go there because He loves white Europeans more than black Africans or other peoples. He just knew they’d receive the gospel faster, and word of it would get out faster. That’s not a racist thing to say, it’s a generational thing. At that time they were more open to the gospel, and the church in Greece did get it out fast (IThes.1:9). The Romans in Italy helped (Rom.1:8) by using the famous Roman roads. It helped when Paul was thrown in the palace slammer, and the royals heard about it (Phil.1:13). They wanted to meet this famous prisoner, and some of them got saved (4:22). When word of that got out down those Roman roads, it made it acceptable to be a Christian—even posh!

When Paul first passed through Galatia here (Acts 18:6) he had eye trouble (Gal.4:13-15) that Jewish kingdom prophets like Elijah used to be able to heal. But the prophet Silas (Acts 15:32) was with Paul (15:40,41), and couldn’t heal him because the dispensation was changing. God didn’t heal him, so he could learn how to be spiritually strong (IICor.12:7-9). Comparing the “they” of Acts 16:6,7 to the “we” of verse 10 shows Luke had joined Paul, Silas and Timothy (16:1-5). This proves things were changing, for Luke was a doctor (Col.4:14), and Paul now needed a doctor. God shut down Luke’s kingdom program, so he served God as Paul’s doctor.

We see a type of another dispensational change in the way God showed Paul this vision. In time past, God Himself appeared in men’s visions, or He sent an angel to appear in their visions to deliver His message. Paul saw a man delivering God’s message, typifying how today God’s messengers are men, not angels. We see this change first typified when Saul saw Ananias in a dream right after the dispensation began with his conversion (Acts 9:11,12). We see another dispensational change typified when the man begged Paul to come. In time past, God ordered men to do things. That typifies the difference between law and grace. For example, under the law, God commanded men to walk in His ways through Moses (Deut.5:33). Under grace, God beseeches us to walk in His ways through Paul (Eph.4:1; IThes.4:1). The dispensations they were achangin’!

A video of this sermon is available on YouTube: “The Dispensations Are A-changin” Acts 16:6-11

¿Qué pasa con ‘El cielo es real’?

En 2014, una película popular llamada “Heaven Is For Real” contó la historia de un niño de 3 años que tuvo una experiencia cercana a la muerte. Después les contó a sus padres historias sobre su viaje al cielo. Esta historia a menudo se promociona como “prueba” de que el Cielo es real.

Pero como dijo el Señor, “nadie subió al cielo” (Juan 3:13). Sabemos que más tarde, cuando Pablo fue apedreado (Hechos 14:19), fue “arrebatado hasta el tercer cielo” (II Cor. 12:2), pero esto fue para que pudiera continuar “llegando a visiones y revelaciones del Señor” (v. 1). Ahora que la Biblia está completa, no hay necesidad de más revelaciones de Dios, por lo que no hay necesidad de que nadie sea arrebatado al cielo y regrese.

La única información confiable sobre el cielo se encuentra en la Palabra de Dios. Después de describir la visión del reino de los cielos que el Señor le dio, Pedro agregó que la Palabra de Dios era “más segura” que lo que había visto con sus propios ojos (II Pedro 1:16-19).

Es tentador pensar que la experiencia de este muchacho persuadirá a la gente a creer, pero Abraham tenía razón: “si no oyen a Moisés y a los profetas, tampoco se persuadirán aunque alguno se levantare de los muertos” (Lucas 16:31).


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.


Paul Begins to Train Timothy – Acts 16:1-5

 

Summary:

Timothy was already a “disciple” (v.1), so how can Paul call him his “son” (ITim.1:2), a name reserved for men he led to Christ (cf.Phile.1:10)? Paul led Tim to the Lord during his first visit in Acts 14:6,7. He had help from Tim’s mom, who prepared his heart by teaching him the Scriptures (IITim.3: 15). Her mom prepared her (IITim.1:5), so she could prepare him. Finding Tim saved, Paul began to prepare him for the ministry, so he in turn could prepare others (IITim.2:2).

Since Grandma Lois raised Tim’s mom Eunice in the Jewish faith, she would have taught her not to marry a Gentile (Deut.7:1-3). But Eunice didn’t listen (Acts 16:1). And when verse 1 described her as “a Jewess which believed,” but doesn’t describe her husband as a Greek who believed, he must not have been saved. That’s why Acts 16:1 says “behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus.” Great men of God don’t often come from a marriage of mixed faith, but Eunice overcame that disadvantage by teaching her son the Word of God!

Since it had been 7 years since Paul led Tim to the Lord, he had time to become well known among the brethren in two cities (Acts 16:2). Part of that was Paul’s doing, for Paul visited Tim’s town a second time to confirm him (Acts 14:21, 22). So by the time Paul made this third visit, he saw so much he liked in Tim, he decided to take him with to preach in other cities (Acts 16:3) to train him for the ministry.

Picking a half-Jew/half-Gentile to help him was a picture of what was happening in Acts. Paul’s first helpers, Barnabas and Silas, were fully Jewish, Tim was half Jewish, and later Paul picked a full Gentile named Titus to help him. That pictures how God’s servants went from being Jews to Gentiles, as they are today. Tim typified the Body of Christ, made up of Jews and Gentiles (ICor.12:13). He needed wine for his sickliness (ITim.5:23), a type of how the early church needed the wine of the gifts of the Spirit (cf.Acts 2:4,13) until the Bible was complete.

Tim probably got saved at age 5 and began training seven years later at age 12. That’s the only way 12 years later he could still be called a “youth” (ITim.4:12). Twelve is the age Jewish boys had their bar mitzvah, and were considered old enough to begin apprenticing for their life’s work.

But why’d Paul circumcise Tim (Acts 16:3)? It was because the Jews in that area knew he wasn’t circumcised, and would not let him in their synagogues when Paul came to preach to them. So Paul let Tim become “as” a Jew to win them (ICor. 9:20-23), as James advised us all to do (Acts 15:19-21).

But that doesn’t mean it’s okay to be baptized so Baptists will let you teach in their church, so you can win them to the grace message! Circumcision gave a Gentile a new nationality: Jewish. So Paul circumcised Timothy to make him acceptable to Jews as a member of the Hebrew nation, not to make him acceptable as a member of the Hebrew religion. But no one is a Baptist by nationality, so the only reason to be baptized would be to join the Baptist religion.

Later, Paul refused to let his Gentile helper Titus be circumcised (Gal.2:3-5), because that wouldn’t gain those Jews to Paul’s faith, it would join Titus to the Jews’ faith, and obligated him to keep the law (Gal.5:3cf.Rom.6:15).

The “decrees” (Acts 16:4) were the ones James made in Acts 15. Paul was delivering them to Gentiles, and he could now point to Tim as a living example of doing things not to offend the Jews! Paul established those new Gentile members of the Body of Christ (Acts 16:5) with the mystery (Rom.16:25).

All of that ended up being the first step in Tim’s training. Lesson #1 was how to be respectful of the convictions of others. Sad to say, many grace believers haven’t learned it!

A video of this sermon is available on YouTube: “Paul Begins To Train Timothy” Acts 16:1-5

Did the Chief Priests or Judas Buy the Potter’s Field?

“Matthew 27:6-10 says the chief priests bought the potter’s field, and Acts 1:18 says Judas did. Which was it?”

Judas returned the 30 pieces of silver he received for betraying the Lord to the priests, but they said, “It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood” (Matt. 27:6). Because of that, the money was never technically theirs to use to purchase anything. But Judas was dead, so technically he couldn’t purchase anything either. So it is not incorrect to attribute the purchase to both.

If that’s not clear, let’s say a Mafia hitman killed someone, then felt remorseful enough to donate the money he was paid to a church right before killing himself, in hopes of staving off God’s condemnation for his wicked act. If the church had a policy of refusing to receive ill-gotten gain from morally objectionable sources, they might in turn give the money to the family of the hitman’s victim.

In such a case, it could be said that the hitman actually donated the money to the victim, since the church policy technically prohibited them from receiving the money and being able to donate it to anyone. But it would also be correct to say that the church contributed the gift, because dead men can’t donate any money to anyone either. And in the same way, it’s not incorrect to ascribe the purchase of the field to both Judas and to the priests.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.


Un apóstol según la fe

En su epístola al joven pastor Tito, el apóstol Pablo habló de su apostolado de una manera única, diciendo:

“Pablo…apóstol…según la fe de los escogidos de Dios…” (Tito 1:1)

¿Qué podría haber querido decir Pablo cuando dijo que fue hecho apóstol “según la fe de los escogidos de Dios”?

Bueno, la palabra “elegido” significa escogido, por supuesto. Cuando tenemos una elección, elegimos un candidato para que sea nuestro líder. Y cuando se trata de los elegidos de Dios, incluso los enemigos del Señor sabían que Él era el elegido de Dios (Lucas 23:35). Usted mismo se convirtió en parte de los elegidos de Dios cuando creyó en el evangelio y Dios lo colocó “en Cristo” (I Corintios 1:30). Así es como ha funcionado siempre, en cada dispensación. Isaías identificó al Señor Jesús como el elegido de Dios (Isa. 42:1 cf. Mt. 12:18, 19), pero luego identificó a los creyentes en Israel como los elegidos de Dios (65:9, 22).

Pero cuando Pablo dijo que había sido hecho apóstol según la fe de los elegidos de Dios, eso no puede estar hablando de la fe que ponemos en Cristo para ser parte de los elegidos. Nuestra fe no apareció hasta mucho después de que Pablo fuera hecho apóstol, por lo que no pudo haber sido hecho apóstol de acuerdo con esa fe. Cualquiera que sea la fe de la que está hablando aquí, debe haber existido antes de que Pablo fuera apóstol, y él fue hecho apóstol de acuerdo con ella.

Aquí es útil recordar que la frase “la fe” puede referirse a un cuerpo de verdad, como lo hace cuando Pablo y Bernabé “volvieron de nuevo a Listra, Iconio y Antioquía… exhortándolos a continuar en la fe” (Hechos 14:21,22). Vemos esta misma definición de la frase “la fe” cuando Pablo más tarde ayudó a algunas iglesias a ser “establecidas en la fe” (Hechos 16:5). En estos versículos, “la fe” se refiere claramente al cuerpo de verdad dado a Pablo. Esa es la cosa en la que los creyentes deben establecerse, y esa es la cosa en la que deben continuar, como insisten esos versículos y otros (cf. Rom. 16:25; Hechos 13:43, I Tim. 4:16, II Timoteo 3:14).

Y eso es lo que significa la frase “la fe” en Tito 1:1 también. El cuerpo de verdad que le fue dado a Pablo existía en la mente de Dios antes de que el mundo comenzara, y Pablo fue hecho apóstol de acuerdo con él. Es decir, fue hecho apóstol para revelar esa fe y predicarla, y dar a conocer ese cuerpo de verdad. Pablo la llama “antes que viniese la fe” (Gálatas 3:23) porque mientras existió en la mente de Dios antes del comienzo del mundo, dice que Dios “manifestó su palabra por medio de la predicación que me ha sido encomendada” (Tito 1:3). Es el mensaje de la gracia de Dios, y es la razón por la que Pablo escribió que había “recibido la gracia y el apostolado, para la obediencia a la fe en todas las naciones” (Rom. 1:5).

¿Ha sido obediente a la fe, y “obedeció de corazón la forma de doctrina que les fue dada” por medio de Pablo (Rom. 6:17)? Pablo dice que Dios nos imputará su propia justicia “si creemos en aquel que levantó de los muertos a Jesús, Señor nuestro;

“El cual fue entregado por nuestras transgresiones, y resucitado para nuestra justificación” (Romanos 4:24,25).

“Cree en el Señor Jesucristo, y serás salvo” (Hechos 16:31).


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.


¿Estás trabajando en vano?

“Así que, hermanos míos amados, estad firmes y constantes, creciendo en la obra del Señor siempre, sabiendo que vuestro trabajo en el Señor no es en vano” (I Corintios 15:58).

¡Qué maravillosas palabras de seguridad! ¿Quién de nosotros no ha sentido, en algún momento u otro, que nuestro trabajo por el Señor es en vano? En tales momentos, ¡qué consuelo es descansar en esta garantía incondicional, incondicional y dada por Dios de que nuestro trabajo por Él no es en vano!

Pero, ¿cómo pudo Pablo decir tal cosa, a la luz de sus palabras a los gálatas, donde dijo:

“Tengo miedo de vosotros, no sea que os haya dado trabajo en vano” (Gálatas 4:11).

Aquí el apóstol parece temer que sus esfuerzos para establecer a los gálatas en las doctrinas de la gracia serían en vano si continuaran anhelando la Ley.

Y qué hay de Filipenses 2:16, donde Pablo exhorta a los filipenses a ser:

“Sosteniendo la palabra de vida; para que me regocije en el día de Cristo, que no he corrido en vano, ni trabajado en vano.”

Aquí suena como si el trabajo de Pablo hubiera sido en vano si los filipenses fallaban en proclamar la palabra de vida y seguir sus otras instrucciones en este pasaje.

Luego, para colmo, también hay I Tesalonicenses 3: 5 para considerar, donde Pablo les dijo a los tesalonicenses:

“…Envié para conocer vuestra fe, no sea que el tentador os haya tentado, y nuestro trabajo sea en vano.”

Aquí nuevamente, Pablo parece temeroso de que todo el trabajo que había realizado sobre el pueblo de Dios podría ser en vano si las tentaciones del tentador lograran desviar a los tesalonicenses de la fe.

En vista de afirmaciones como estas, ¿cómo pudo Pablo afirmar tan categóricamente que el trabajo de los corintios no fue en vano? ¿Hicieron un mejor trabajo que él? ¡Seguramente no! Creemos que la respuesta está en la seguridad que Pablo les dio de que su trabajo no fue en vano “en el Señor”. Si bien era posible que la labor del gran apóstol Pablo fuera en vano en los gálatas, filipenses y tesalonicenses, no es posible que ninguna de nuestras labores sea en vano en el Señor.

¿Por qué es eso? Bueno, recuerda que Pablo dice del Tribunal de Cristo que “cada uno recibirá su recompensa según su trabajo” (I Cor. 3:8). Note que vamos a ser recompensados de acuerdo a nuestro trabajo, no de acuerdo al fruto de nuestro trabajo. Es decir, Dios tiene la intención de recompensarnos en base a nuestra fidelidad, no en la fidelidad de aquellos a quienes otorgamos nuestro trabajo. Si esto no fuera así, incluso las recompensas de Pablo serían pocas, porque después de todo el trabajo que hizo en Asia, todos en Asia se apartaron de él (II Timoteo 1:15).

Y así, si la infidelidad de aquellos a quienes otorgas tu trabajo espiritual te hace pensar que todos tus esfuerzos han sido en vano, recuerda que tu trabajo puede ser en vano en ellos, pero tu trabajo no es en vano en el Señor. ¡Tienes la Palabra de Dios en él!

Por supuesto, si no va a haber un tribunal de Cristo, entonces su trabajo por el Señor es en vano. Si el lector se pregunta por qué podemos decir algo así, recuerde que algunos de los corintios insistían en que no existe tal cosa como la resurrección de los muertos (I Corintios 15:12). Y si no hay resurrección, no habrá Juicio a seguir, y si no va a haber un Juicio, ¡entonces nuestro trabajo es en vano! ¡Este razonamiento erróneo y progresivo amenazaba con detener todo el trabajo para el Señor en Corinto! No es de extrañar que el apóstol comience este capítulo de la resurrección primero asegurándoles a los corintios que su fe no fue “en vano” (15:2, 14, 17), y luego pasó a asegurarles que su trabajo no fue en vano.

Mientras que algunos líderes espirituales evitan enseñar doctrina porque, en su opinión, la doctrina no es muy práctica, el apóstol Pablo tenía otra opinión. La incredulidad en la doctrina de la resurrección de los muertos amenazaba con asfixiar la fe y el trabajo de los santos en Corinto, pero el caso hermético que Pablo presentó a favor de la resurrección en este bendito capítulo explica por qué pudo decir que “por lo tanto” tenemos todo el incentivo que necesitamos para estar “siempre abundando en la obra del Señor”.

Entonces, si a veces se siente como si simplemente estuviera haciendo girar sus ruedas y sin llegar a ninguna parte con la gente mientras trabaja para el Señor, cerramos con otra promesa incondicional del apóstol de la gracia:

“Y no nos cansemos, pues, de hacer bien; porque a su tiempo segaremos, si no desmayamos” (Gálatas 6:9).


"Dos Minutos con la Biblia" le permite comenzar el día con artículos de estudio bíblicos breves pero potentes de la Sociedad Bíblica Berea. Regístrate ahora para recibir Dos Minutos con la Biblia todos los días en tu bandeja de entrada de correo electrónico. Nunca compartiremos tu información personal y puedes cancelar tu suscripción en cualquier momento.