Discretion Is the Better Part of Glamour

You’ve probably heard the old saying, “Discretion is the better part of valor.”  This Shakespearean expression is said to mean that good judgment is better than rash bravery, and prudence is preferable to careless courage.  That’s good advice, wise counsel that many an aged soldier has passed on to younger soldiers before they went off to war.  Sound counsel like that ensures that our soldiers will make the most of their time in the service of our country, and make their lives count in the battle to preserve our freedom.

But as soldiers of the cross, the Apostle Paul tells us that there are some things that aged Christian women should pass on to younger Christian women, things that he wrote about in his epistle to Titus:

“The aged women… may teach the young women… to be discreet, chaste…” (Titus 2:3-5).

The word “discreet” means prudent, or wise when it comes to avoiding mistakes.  It can also have the idea of exercising good judgment, and knowing the best way to accomplish a purpose.  After Joseph told Pharaoh that seven years of famine were coming, he suggested, “let Pharaoh look out a man discreet and wise, and set him over the land of Egypt” (Gen. 41:33).  It was absolutely crucial that Pharaoh find a man wise enough to avoid making mistakes, for it was going to be up to Egypt to keep the known world alive during those seven years of famine!  They needed a prudent man who could exercise good judgment, and know how to accomplish the purpose of saving the world. 

It is equally crucial for young Christian wives and mothers to be discreet, wise enough to avoid the mistakes that can destroy a marriage and family, and prudent enough to always exercise good judgment, so as to accomplish the purpose of making a home for their husbands and children.  King Solomon had a thousand wives, and he wrote,

“As a jewel of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a fair woman which is without discretion” (Proverbs 11:22).

That’s what the wisest man in the world said about a pretty wife who was too foolish to learn to be discreet.  If you are a young man looking for a wife, you might want to keep that proverb in mind.  And if you are a husband who is married to a discreet wife, that’s something for which you should thank God—especially if she is also “chaste,” the next thing that Paul says aged women should teach young women to be.  Chastity is purity from extramarital sexual contact, and ignoring it is a mistake that exercises the highest form of bad judgment in marriage, for infidelity is one of the fastest ways to destroy a marriage and family.

Unless you are in what is called an “open marriage,” a union in which couples give one another permission to cheat.  The fact that such a term even exists shows how low our society has plummeted in morality.  Some very famous people have (or have had) open marriages, but if those people are your role models in life, you need to trade up for some better ones!

Young Christian women who seek to be soldiers of the cross should want to fight to preserve their marriages, for in doing so, they will make the most of their time in the service of the Savior, and make their lives count for Him.  And since discretion and chastity are the very first things that Paul says aged Christian women should teach young Christian women, we know that being discreet and chaste are foundational virtues in which wives of all ages should seek to excel.

Women seek to be glamorous by nature, but Christian women should remember that discretion is the better part of glamour, and that there is nothing more attractive to a husband than a faithful wife.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

The Fullness of God and Men – Acts 6:8-15

Summary:

Stephen was filled with “faith” or faithfulness (cf. Rom. 3:3) and miracle working “power” (6:8) because he was filled with the Spirit (Acts 2:4; 6:5) and faith and power were gifts of the Spirit (I Cor. 12:8-10).  The Spirit filled and controlled them (Ezek. 36:27) to where they couldn’t sin (I Jo. 3:9), but that didn’t mean He overpowered their personalities.

We know that because the 12 told the disciples to pick 7 men filled with wisdom and the Spirit to settle a dispute (Acts 6:1-3).  But they were all filled with both, so how could they choose?  Well, they were also to pick men “of honest report,” which can mean fair and equitable men.  But honesty wasn’t one of the gifts of the Spirit, so we know the Spirit didn’t eclipse their personalities in that taste of the kingdom of heaven on earth—and He won’t eclipse ours either when we get to the kingdom of heaven in heaven.  They weren’t a bunch of mindless robots, and we won’t be either!

Why Stephen (6:9) and not Peter?  A year has now passed since Acts 2:4 and God is about to cut Israel down for rejecting Christ’s apostles (Luke 13:6-9).  Since Stephen’s name means “crown,” he’s about to become an example of how Tribulation Jews will have to be faithful to death to get eternal life (Rev. 2:10).  God needed the 12 alive to continue the kingdom program during the “diminishing” of Israel (Rom. 11:12), to write epistles to kingdom saints that will be in the Bible for the Tribulation.  So He couldn’t have Peter die.

After the persecution of the Jewish council (Acts 5:40,41) the “disputing” came from average Jews, not the leaders (6:9), as the Lord predicted (Mt. 10:17).  The “Libertines” may have been formed to look for liberty from their enemies in Rome (Lu. 1:70) but now the Lord’s disciples were their main enemy.  So now they were fighting for the “liberty” found in the law (Ps. 119:133, 145).  In the measure they followed the law, they were free from sin.  They later charged the 12 with blaspheming the law (6:13) because the 12 were preaching freedom from sin through Christ, just as He did (Jo. 8:32-36).  That’s why James called it a “law of liberty” (Jam. 2:12).  The Lord wanted to give the Jews complete liberty from their sins by filling them with His Spirit and making them able to keep the law perfectly.  The Libertines thought they didn’t need that, because they thought they were keeping the law well enough to be saved on their own.

The Alexandrians (6:9) were probably also strong for the law, like their favorite son (Acts 18:24).  “Them of Cilicia” produced Saul (22:3) so they were also zealous for the law, and they too joined the Libertines in championing the law.

But all those zealots of the law couldn’t compete with Stephen’s gift of wisdom (6:10)—and he was just a waiter (6:5).  Men won’t be able to resist your wisdom either if you have the truth rightly divided, unlike the Jews who clung to the law here.  They couldn’t resist his gracious “spirit” either, the spirit of grace—and you can have that too (Col. 4:6).

They suborned men to lie (6:11) so they could get the kingdom, like Jezebel did (I Ki. 21:1-10), a type of how Israel’s religious leaders got men to lie to kill the Lord (Mt. 21:38) and kill Stephen, the rightful owners of the vineyard of Israel

They “caught” Stephen (6:11), meaning he was running away.  If the government persecutes you, you can run, but you must follow David’s example and not resist them (I Sa. 24).

Since they bore false witness about Stephen and then gnashed on him (Acts 7:54), I have to believe he prayed for his enemies in between (cf. Ps. 35:11-16 cf. Mt.5:44).

They claimed Stephen was saying the Lord would destroy the temple (6:14) because they purposely misunderstood when He said He’d destroy the temple of His body and raise it up (Jo. 2:19-21).  And Stephen was preaching Christ’s resurrection.  We know neither the Lord nor Stephen destroyed the “customs” of the law, for the Lord always observed the “custom” of the feasts (Lu. 2:41,42) and Stephen was there at this next Pentecost a year later.

God replied to these charges by saying, “You want to charge him with speaking against Moses and the law?  I’ll make him look like Moses when he got the law!” (6:15 cf. Ex.34:29-34).

Video of this sermon is available on YouTube: The Fullness of God and Men – Acts 6:8-15

Aged Women Teachers

“The aged women likewise, that they be… teachers of good things” (Titus 2:3).

When I was a boy, I remember reading about a mother who taught her daughter to cut off the end of a roast before placing it in the oven, laying the part she cut off in the pan next to the roast.  She explained that that’s how her mother had taught her to prepare a roast.  When her daughter asked why, her mom wasn’t sure, so the girl called her grandmother to find out.  Grandma explained that it was because she never owned a pan long enough for a roast!

Now that sounds like something that aged women don’t need to teach anyone.  And life is filled with things like that!  Maybe that’s why, after telling “aged women” to be “teachers of good things” (Titus 2:3), the Apostle Paul went on to talk about the kinds of things he wanted them to teach—and to whom he wished they would teach them.  Speaking of aged women, he wrote,

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands” (Tit. 2:4).

Aged Christian women are to teach younger Christian women.  And the first thing Paul says to teach them is to be sober.  That word has different meanings in Scripture, but when Paul uses it right after telling aged women to be “not given to much wine” (v. 3), I have to believe he wanted younger women to learn not to give themselves to much wine as wellIf you’re not sure why young wives might need to be taught this, it might be because Paul also says that young women should be taught “to love their husbands.”  When a woman is married to a man who is hard to love, it’s much easier to give herself to wine than it is to learn to love him.

Aged Christian women should teach younger women to love their husbands by example, of course.  Ladies, when you are making the often-difficult decision of whether to love your difficult husband, or drown your sorrows in alcohol instead, keep in mind that whichever path you choose, you are setting an example for younger women—and to society in general.  What woman doesn’t want to make the world a better place in which to live?  Well, if a young woman is married, the primary way in which she can accomplish this worthy goal is to learn to love her husband.

Another way aged women can teach younger women to love an unlovable husband is by reminding them that loving the unlovable is what the Lord did when He died for us.  “Christ died for the ungodly…when we were enemies” (Rom. 5:6,10).  Talk about loving the unlovable!  If our sinless Savior could love sinners like us, no wife can ever say she can’t love her unlovable husband —and no husband can say he can’t love his unlovable wife, as Paul also commands (Eph. 5:25).

In marriage counseling I have often heard husbands and wives lament, “I just don’t love my spouse anymore.” My response has always been the same.  I remind husbands and wives that they can learn to love their spouses.  If Paul says that aged women are to teach younger women to love their husbands, that means love can be taught.  And if love can be taught, it can be learned.

Many husbands are hard to love, but somewhere on the planet is the best husband on earth.  You’d think that it wouldn’t be hard for his wife to love him, but the best husband on earth is still a man with a fallen sin nature that he inherited from Adam.  That means he may not have the flaws of many of the other men on earth, but he’s not perfect.  If you don’t believe me, just ask his wife!

But let me tell you something about her sin nature.  Instead of being grateful that he doesn’t have all the flaws of other men, she’s focusing on the few flaws he does have.  It’s just human nature.  His flaws might seem small to you, but I guarantee they seem big to her.  That’s human nature as well.  But the woman with the world’s best husband must also learn to love her husband.

Loving the unlovable is good advice for us all.  So if you know how, why not teach some-one else how?  And if you haven’t yet learned to “walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us” (Eph. 5:2), why not determine to begin learning how today, by learning more of how Christ loved us.

The Grecian Formula – Acts 6:1-7

Summary:

When the Grecians complained, the apostles had to come up with a formula to address their complaint (6:1).  But if this was a foretaste of the kingdom of heaven on earth, does that mean there will be complaints when we get to the kingdom of heaven in heaven? 

Yes!  That’s why we’ll have to “judge angels” (I Cor. 6:3). Angels are sinless but not perfect.  They will have disputes similar to this one in Acts 6 that they’ll need us to settle.  Meanwhile, the 12 apostles will be doing the same thing in the kingdom of heaven on earth (Mt. 19:28) among saved Jews who will be sinless but not perfect either.  And we’re seeing this pictured here in Acts 6.  We’re not seeing a breakdown of the harmony in the church here (Acts 1:14; 2:1,46; 4:32).  We’re seeing how the harmony was maintained, and how it will be maintained in the kingdom.

Heaven will be perfect, but not in the way many people think  Many Christians think we won’t have to go to work, but Eden was perfect, and Adam had a job (Gen. 2:15).And being a judge is a job, so we’ll have to go to work to judge angels.

People of other nations that spoke Greek were called Greeks (Mark 7:26).  People of the Jewish nation who spoke Greek, who grew up in other lands, were called “Grecians.”  The “daily ministration” that was neglecting the Grecian widows was the distribution to the needs of the saints (Acts 2:44,45).  It couldn’t have been on purpose, for neglecting widows would have been a sin (Ex. 22:22), and these saints couldn’t sin (I Jo. 3:9).  They were sinless, just not perfect.

The apostles didn’t think helping with this was beneath them, but passed on helping (6:2) because, in order to look into this neglect, they would have had to do some neglecting of their own.  They’d have had to neglect their spiritual gift of teaching (Rom. 12:7 cf. I Tim. 4:14).

Instead, they helped by delegating authority (6:3), as Moses did when the Jews were multiplied in his day, as they were here at Pentecost (Deut. 1:10-17).

When they deferred to give themselves to teaching instead (6:4), that suggests men needed to be taught the Word there in the kingdom of heaven on earth, and that suggests that men will need it in the kingdom of heaven in heaven.  That answers the question I’m often asked, if we’ll know the Bible perfectly the instant we enter heaven.  No!  The Bible is an eternal Book, and we’ll delight in studying it for all eternity.  Imagine how boring eternity would be otherwise!

We’ll talk more about Stephen and Philip (6:5) in Acts 7,8. And these other men aren’t mentioned elsewhere, so there is nothing we can know about them.  Although “Nicolas” might have been the father of the cult in Revelation 2:6,14,15 that was associated with fornication.  Church history says Nicolas started taking  that business of living with all things common (Acts 2:44; 4:32) too far, saying men shouldn’t say their wives were their own (Acts 4:32), leading to fornication

They ordained these men by laying hands on them (6:6) to give them the gift of ministry (Rom. 12:6) to help them operate “the daily ministration.”

But while we know nothing about these men, we know they were all Grecians, as their Greek names indicate!  You wouldn’t pick a fox to guard the henhouse that he’s most likely to rob, but these disciples picked Grecian leaders who were most likely to side with Grecian widows in this dispute!

That’s grace!  The Jews could have said, “It’s a Jewish church, we’re picking Jewish judges, and if you don’t like it, you can leave.”  Of course, unsaved men would say, “That’s not fair, you need to pick 3 Hebrews, 3 Grecians, and 1 proselyte,” thinking no one could propose a better solution.  But God did!  Grace is always a better solution, for grace always goes above and beyond the call (Eph. 3:20).  Do you?

If you could settle all your disputes as graciously, you might see the same results these saints saw: priests who a short while ago opposed them (Acts 4:1-3) believed (6:7).

“The faith” you had to be “obedient” to in the Jewish nation was Acts 2:38, but the faith to be obedient to among “all nations” was Paul’s gospel (Rom.1:5; 16:25,26).  It still is!

Video of this sermon is available on YouTube: The Grecian Formula – Acts 6:1-7

Advice For Aged Women

“The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers…” (Titus 2:3).

Former first lady Barbara Bush was one of our nation’s most beloved aged women.  In her memoirs, she tells how she and her husband George were once at a state dinner in Japan while he was our president.  She was seated next to the emperor, but just couldn’t seem to engage him in conversation.  He replied to every inquiry with a “yes” or a “no.”  Finally, she complimented him on the splendor of his official residence.  He responded: “Thank you.”  Undaunted, she pressed on.  “Is it new?”  “Yes.”  “Well, was the old palace so old that it was falling down?”  “No.  You bombed it.”  At that point, she turned to talk to the person sitting on her other side!

Mrs. Bush tried to courteously engage the emperor in conversation for she knew she represented her husband and her country.  But Christian aged women represent the Lord, so Paul says they should be “in behaviour as becometh holiness.”  The word “holiness” has different meanings, but when Paul says that aged women should be “likewise” in behavior as becometh holiness, he must mean they should be holy in the ways in which he had just encouraged aged men to be holy (vs.1,2).  After all, what’s good for the aged gander is good for the aged goose!

But aged women should know that it is especially important for them to be holy, for women are the guardians of decency in society.  Did you ever wonder why, in speaking of the sins of the ancient Gentile world, Paul wrote that “even their women” were engaged in those abominable sins (Rom. 1:26)?  It is because women, by their very nature, are more refined.  We see this illustrated in the account of the creation of men and women.  God made man from the dust of the earth, but He drew woman from the man.  Thus women are by nature further removed from the dirt of which we men were created!  Because of this, women can often rein us men in by simply being who they are.  This is especially important for aged women, who must set an example for younger women.

But after telling aged women to be holy like the men, Paul singles out an area where it is harder for women to be holy when he says they shouldn’t be “false accusers.”  If you’re wondering why women would have more trouble with that than men, it’s not because they talk more, as I might suggest if I were a sexist!  It is because when women want to hurt someone, they tend to use their words and not their fists like us men.  That’s why when Paul talked about the qualifications of a spiritual leader, he wrote,

“A bishop then must be… not given to wine… no striker… not a brawler(I Tim. 3:2,3).

But when he gave the qualifications for the wife of a spiritual leader, he wrote,

“Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers” (I Tim. 3:11).

The Greek word for “slanderers” there is the same as the word translated “false accusers” in our text, the word diabolos.  Aged women need to be reminded that it is simply diabolical to slander someone by accusing them falsely.

And the reason Paul adds, “not given to much wine,” is—well, do you know what tends to make a woman slander someone?  The same thing that tends to make a man strike someone—much wine!  Did you notice that before telling leaders to be “no strikers,” Paul tells them to be “not given to wine?”  And right after telling aged women not to be false accusers, he tells them the same thing?  There’s just something about alcohol that overcomes a man’s natural inhibition to deck some jerk, and there’s just something about it that overcomes a woman’s natural inhibition to slander someone as well.

But slandering and striking others is not very holy behavior.  So by God’s grace, let’s all determine to be in behavior as becometh holiness, to the glory and praise of God.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.


Just What the Doctor Ordered – Acts 5:34-42

Summary:

When the religious leaders in Israel began plotting to kill the twelve apostles (5:33), a doctor calmed them down (v. 34, 35).  His willingness to oppose this murderous mob of powerful men shows that Pharisees weren’t all bad, as did Nicodemus (Jo. 3:1-3), who later got saved (Jo. 19:38-40).

Gamaliel was a doctor “of the law,” i.e., a lawyer.  In Israel, that meant he was a doctor of the law of Moses.  Moses’ law wasn’t just Israel’s religious law, it was their civil law, as the constitution is ours. There were lots of lawyers (Lu. 2:46,47).

Gamaliel was “had of reputation,” and reputations aren’t built quickly.  So he was probably one of the lawyers the Lord offered to heal a few years earlier (Lu. 5:17), but who refused Him.  Don’t ever feel sorry for those Pharisees and lawyers, thinking that they never had a chance to be saved. But if Gamaliel didn’t get saved that day, why’d he stick up for the apostles?  Well, for one thing, he was a Pharisee, and the ones opposing the apostles were Sadducees (Acts 5:17,18).  That made Gamaliel friendly toward the enemy of his enemies.  We’ll see more reasons he defended them later.

But if his name sounds familiar, it’s because Acts 22:3 says that he trained Paul before he was saved.  He must have been a big shot in Israel to have “commanded” (Acts 5:34) these rulers not to harm the apostles.  And as all good lawyers do, he cited some legal precedents to help make his case.

Theudas (5:36) is only mentioned here, but if you’re going to boast yourself to be somebody in Israel, it was probably messiah.  Everyone knew messiah would be the son of David (Mt. 22:41,42), and 400 men joined themselves to David too (I Sam. 22:1,2 cf. Acts 5:36).  Israel’s rulers probably didn’t know what do with Theudas when he got popular, but Gamaliel pointed out they didn’t have to do anything. He got himself killed and his followers scattered—and so will the apostles, is what Gamaliel was suggesting.  It was illegal for them to kill anyone (cf. Jo. 18:31), so killing the twelve might have gotten them killed.  Gamaliel knew those “men of Israel” (Acts 5:35) would know the principle of Zechariah 13:7.

Like most lawyers, Gamaliel cited more than one precedent.  This “Judas” (5:37) wasn’t Iscariot.  “Judas” was the Greek version of the popular Hebrew name Judah, father of one of the 12 tribes.  There were even two men named Judas among the apostles (Lu. 6:13-16).  But Iscariot is the Greek form of “Kerioth” (Josh. 15:25), a city in Moab, or a city in southern Judah, and this Judas was from northern Galilee (Acts 5:37).  Besides, he died in the “taxing” (5:37 cf. Lu. 2:1-5), 30 years before Judas even became an apostle.  The reason Gamaliel mentioned “much people” followed him is that the leaders were worried that much people were following the twelve.  But Judas too died and his followers were scattered.

So far, Gamaliel has been warning those leaders about what Rome would do if they killed the apostles.  Next he warns them about what God might do (Acts 5:38,39).  Here he’s probably citing a Jewish legal precedent that he knew those men of Israel would be familiar with (Jeremiah 26:18,19).

Gamaliel was a type of Antichrist.  You say, “Won’t Antichrist try to kill followers of Jesus, not stick up for them?”  Not at first.  He starts out as a peacemaker, probably telling the Jews to leave the followers of Jesus alone, as Gamaliel did.  By the way, Antichrist will rise in the day of taxing (Dn. 11:20,21).  He’ll talk smooth like Gamaliel with war in his heart (Ps. 55:21), war that will come out later when he persecutes the Jews he’ll stick up for initially—like Gamaliel did.  Gamaliel later authorized Saul to slay the followers of Christ.

All doctrines are either of men or of God (Acts 5:38 cf. Mark 11:30).  But will all doctrines of men come to naught as Gamaliel said?  It doesn’t seem that way, but Paul said it was so (II Tim. 3:8,9).  But he meant in eternity to come!  That’s when “all men” will see the folly of the doctrines of men.  Until then, don’t let the success of false doctrines get you down.  Focus on things you can’t see instead (II Cor. 4:16,18).

For religious leaders to tell men of God not to preach what God said is nothing new (Isa. 30:9,10; Amos 2:12; Micah 2:6), but the apostles remembered what the Lord said (Mt. 5:11,12) and rejoiced and continued to preach Christ.

Video of this sermon is available on YouTube: Just What the Doctor Ordered – Acts 5:34-42

Striking Faith and Charity

In Paul’s epistle to Titus, he gives some instructions for “aged men” that contain good advice for believers of all ages, saying,

“That the aged men be… sound in faith, in charity…” (Titus 2:2).

The word “sound” means strong, healthy and wholesome (cf. Isa. 1:5,6), and all of God’s people should aspire to be sound in the virtues Paul mentions here.  But that can be difficult when things in life arise that test our faith and challenge our charity.  That’s why it interests me that another definition of the word “sound” is to strike something to see if it is whole, based on the sound it makes when you strike it.

When I worked in my dad’s tool and die shop as a young man, I worked with surface grinding machines that had a grinding wheel of two feet in diameter that spun at several thousand revolutions per minute.  If the wheel was cracked and unsound it could fly apart at that speed and take out your eye, or even your life.  The problem is, you can’t tell if a grinding wheel is unsound just by looking at it.  So my dad taught me to check the wheel before mounting it on the machine by putting my fingers in the hole in the middle of the wheel, balancing it in my hand, while using my other hand to strike it with a brass hammer.  If it made a clunk sound, that meant it was cracked and dangerous.  If it made a ping sound, then it was healthy and whole.

And I believe that you can tell if you are sound in faith in the same way, when life strikes your faith.  The word “faith” here means faithfulness, as it does when Paul talked about “the faith of God” (Rom. 3:3).  If you want to know the strength of your faithfulness to the Lord, all you have to do is wait for something in life to strike you while faithfully serving Him to see if you will continue to serve Him, or fold like a house of cards. When life strikes some Christians they respond with something that sounds more like a clunk than a ping.  Some even make sounds such as you might hear at the Wailing Wall!  But when life strikes others, their faith rings true.  Does yours?

Similarly, if you want to know if you are sound “in charity,” just wait to see how you react when someone strikes out at you when you offer them charity.  Years ago when I was a painting contractor, a lady hired me to paint her parents’ home—while they were away on vacation!  She wanted to surprise them by doing something nice for them.  But I remember she was very apprehensive about how her charity might be received!  She knew that the old saying, “No good deed goes unpunished,” is often true.  But that’s how you can know if you are sound in charity—when someone lashes out at you for giving it, and you continue steadfast and sound in charity.

Now the reason Paul told “aged men” to be sound in faith and charity is that these are “the things which become sound doctrine” (Titus 2:1).  It’s not very becoming for a believer to profess sound doctrine and not be sound in these virtues.  Others are watching to see if the doctrine that we say is sound doctrine actually works in our lives, and we dare not let them down.

On July 16, 1999, John F. Kennedy Jr. died in a plane crash. When one of his closest friends was interviewed afterward, he pointed out that John Jr. never said or did anything that caused embarrassment to his family name, unlike many of his relatives.  What makes this even more re-markable is the fact that he lived his life under constant scrutiny.  Every time he stepped out of the house he was met by a flurry of photographers, who followed him wherever he went.  Had he said or done anything to embarrass his family name, it would have been all over the evening news.

Could your life hold up under scrutiny like that?  Do you always live in ways that are becoming to the sound doctrine found in Paul’s epistles that we hold dear?  Can it be said of you that you never do anything to embarrass the name of the Lord?  If not, don’t wait until you are aged to start faithfully honoring His name.  Start now.

It Was Time to Break the Law – Acts 5:28-33

Summary:

When the law commands believers to do something that is contrary to what God says (Acts 5:27, 28), we are to stand with Peter and obey God rather than men (v. 29), like the 3 Hebrews did in Daniel 3.

God’s people must always obey the law, even in the Tribulation when the devil makes the Antichrist the law (Rev. 13:1, 2).  We know God will expect His people to obey the Antichrist because while Paul’s epistles are written to us, the epistles that come after Paul’s epistles in the Bible are written to the people who will come after us, the Jews in the Tribulation.  And in one of those epistles, Peter tells them to obey the king (I Pe. 2:13-17).

At first it will be easy to obey the Antichrist, for he will rebuild their temple and protect them from their enemies.  But when he declares himself God (II Thes. 2:3, 4) and the false prophet erects an image of him and demands it be worshipped (Rev. 13:11-15), they will have to obey God’s command against worshipping graven images rather than men.

God “raised up” Jesus (Acts 5:30) to be Israel’s king in the same way He raised up David to be their king (Acts 13:21, 22).  Peter says they hung the Lord on a “tree” instead of saying a cross in reference to Deuteronomy 21:22, which says men hung on trees are cursed.  In quoting that verse, Paul says Christ redeemed us from that curse (Gal. 3:13).  And the tree of Exodus 15:25 was a type of Christ!

God “exalted” the Lord (Acts 5:31), and exalt means to raise high or elevate someone, as it does in Isaiah 52:13.  Verse 14 talks about how the Jews brought the Lord low by beating Him before the cross, described in the next chapter (Isaiah 53:5, 6, 12).  The “therefore” of Acts 2:32, 33 means that the Jews also brought the Lord low by killing Him, but God exalted Him by raising Him from the dead.

Now if you think exalting Him to be “a prince” wasn’t exalting Him very highly, it’s because we think a prince is below a king.  But the word prince often means the sovereign of all, as when the Lord is called “the prince of the kings of the earth” (Rev. 1:5 cf. I Tim. 6:15).  That’s what the Lord would have been exalted to become if the dispensation of the mystery hadn’t interrupted prophecy.

It used to be that Israel’s king couldn’t be a priest.  Saul lost his kingdom offering a sacrifice.  But Christ will be a priest and a king (Zech. 6:12, 13), a prince and a savior (Acts 5:31).

Jews looked for a Savior to save them from their enemies as well as from their sins (Lu. 1:68-75), but the Lord knew He couldn’t do one without the other and still be a just God and a Savior (Is. 45:21).  Rome had conquered them because of their sins (cf. Lev. 26:14, 17), so someone had to pay for their sins before He could save them from their enemies.

In the past, God had other nations pay for Israel’s sins (Isa. 43:3).  When Assyria threatened Israel, God caused Assyria’s king to hear a rumor that those other nations were attacking Syria (II Ki. 19:6-9), and so he left Israel alone and attacked them instead!

But when Israel didn’t let their land rest every 7th year (Lev. 25:4) for 490 years, God let them be conquered by Babylon for 70 years to give their land the 70 years of rest it missed (Lev. 26:27, 33, 34; II Chron. 36:20, 21). In other words, God made the Jews themselves pay for their sins that time.

When they were captives in Rome, God had His own Son pay their ransom (Mt. 20:28).  Peter didn’t understand that yet here in Acts 5, nor that He planned to ransom the Gentiles too, so He could be a just God and a Savior to them as well (Rom. 3:24-27).  That wasn’t revealed until Paul (I Tim. 2:5-7).  Repentance was being given to the Jews in Acts 5:31, but not to the Gentiles till after Paul was saved (Acts 11:18).

The Holy Spirit witnessed to the Jews (Acts 5:32) by the miracles He was empowering the apostles to do (5:12-16).  Now you’d think the Jews would listen to the witness of the Holy Spirit of God, but they sought to kill the apostles instead (Acts 5:33).

Video of this message is available on YouTube: It Was Time to Break the Law – Acts 5:28-33

Behavior That Honors the Savior

Recently I came across a web site called, “Lies Moms Tell Their Kids To Get Them To Behave.”  One mom was so tired of her kids misbehaving while shopping that she told them the store’s security cameras were actually Santa-cams that had a direct feed to the North Pole, and if they misbehaved, Santa would know.

Of course, Paul gives a different reason why children should obey their parents, saying,

“Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right(Ephesians 6:1).

This verse is positively sublime in its splendor and simplicity, for it supplies parents with the answer to the eternal question of “why?”  You tell your son to do something, and he asks, “Why?”  Instead of replying with the usual, “Because I said so,” next time try, “Because God’s Word says that obeying me is the right thing to do!”  That’s also a much better reason to ask children to behave than to win the favor of some mythical North Pole elf!         

But children are not the only ones whom God calls upon to behave.  Paul told Titus,

“But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine: That the aged men be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience” (Titus 2:1,2).

Did you notice that Paul didn’t just tell aged men how to behave, he told them why their behavior should honor the Savior?  He pointed out that the things he mentions here are “the things which become sound doctrine.”  That word “become” means to make something look good, and making sound doctrine look good is something that all Christians should aspire to do!

Of course, for aged men, some of these things can be pretty challenging.  Take that last one, for example.  In the Bible, the word “patience” is often associated with patiently waiting for the Lord to come, as it is in the first time the Bible mentions patience:

“Rest in the LORD, and wait patiently for Him: fret not thyself because of him who prospereth in his way” (Psalm 37:7).

Now I know that the psalmist was talking about waiting patiently for the Lord’s coming at the end of the Tribulation to set up the kingdom of heaven on earth for the people of Israel.  But the principle he expresses here holds true for us members of the Body of Christ, who are looking for the “blessed hope” of the Rapture (Tit. 2:13).  Christians of all ages should wait patiently for the Lord to rapture us to Heaven, where we’ll enjoy all the blessings of the life to come, and not “fret” over the way that unsaved men seem to be prospering in this life.  It’s easy to get impatient for the coming of the Lord if you spend your time looking at all the people in the world who are prospering in worldly things.

And being sound in this kind of patience is especially hard for aged Christian men, who have spent their entire lives watching unsaved men prosper, while they themselves gave a lot of money to the Lord’s work that could have prospered them had they kept it instead.  Add to this the aches and pains of old age, and it is no wonder Paul tells aged men to be sound in patience as they wait for the coming of the Lord!

Do you know what will help you to stop fretting over the prosperity of unsaved men at any age?  Paul gives us the secret when he wrote about being “strengthened with all might…unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness” (Col. 1:11), and then added,

“Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light” (v. 12).

Being thankful for the inheritance that lies before us in Heaven goes a long way in helping us look past the prosperity of others in this life.  So thank God for your salvation, and then “rest in the Lord, and wait patiently for Him!”


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.


The Anger of Israel’s Religious Leaders – Acts 5:17-28

Summary:

The apostles were healing “every one” that came to them (5:16), so the religious leaders in Israel were “filled with indignation” (5:17) or anger, while the apostles were “filled with the Holy Ghost” (2:4).  We too can choose to be filled with the Spirit instead of being filled with anger (Eph. 5:18) by being filled with God’s Word (Col.1:9,10).

These leaders were so angry they jailed the apostles (v.18) for the second time (4:1-3).  But the Lord showed what He thought of their incarceration when He sent “the angel of the Lord” to spring them out of jail (5:19,20).  That exact phrase sometimes referred to a theophany, a pre-incarnate appearance of Christ (cf. Ex. 3:2,4,6).  But here it appears to be just one of God’s regular angels, who were “ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation” like the apostles (Heb. 1:14).

But if God’s people are always supposed to obey the government, why would God undermine the authority of Israel’s government by breaking the apostles that they incarcerated out of jail?  It was because those men were no longer the legitimate rulers in Israel.  The Lord had warned them He would take the kingdom away from them (Mt. 21:43) and give it to the “little flock” of His followers (Lu. 12:32). That means the apostles were the new leaders of Israel, so the old rulers were wrong to incarcerate the new leaders, and the angel did nothing wrong breaking the new leaders out of jail.

This jailbreak was predicted (Ps. 69:33).  As it says there, the Lord helped the poor at Pentecost when He had the disciples sell all they had and give the proceeds to the poor to be saved (Lu. 18:18,22), and showed He didn’t despise His prisoners when He released them.  We see Pentecost predicted again in Psalm 146:3-9, where the Jews were told not to trust princes like Israel’s leaders, the hungry are mentioned as being fed again when those proceeds were shared, and prisoners were loosed, causing the way of those wicked rulers to be turned upside down.  You see, the psalms will be the guidebook of the Tribulation that these apostles were heading into if God hadn’t interrupted prophecy.

The angel told the apostles to go speak “all” the words of eternal life (5:20) because the apostles might have been tempted to omit the words the Sadducees didn’t want to hear, those about the resurrection of Christ (cf. Mt.22:23).

The only other time a “senate” (Acts 5:21) is referred to is Pharaoh’s (Ps. 105:20-22).  He saw Joseph’s miraculous interpretation of his dream and freed him from prison and put him over his senators.  That may be why the senate is mentioned here.  When Israel’s senate convened, the Jews might have thought of Pharaoh’s senate and realized that their ruler (the high priest) should do what Pharaoh did: recognize the miracles that the apostles were doing and free them from prison and put them over his senate. It wouldn’t be the first time God shamed the Jews with the Gentiles (cf. Luke 4:25-30).

The high priest sent soldiers to fetch the apostles out of prison (Acts 5:21), not knowing the twelve were already free and teaching in the temple.  The soldiers reported that the jail keepers didn’t see them escape (5:22), so the angel must have pulled an Acts 12:5-10 here.  Notice that the leaders didn’t doubt that another miracle had taken place (cf. Acts 4:16), they only doubted “whereunto it would grow.”  They feared the people would think the Spirit whisked them out of jail like He used to whisk Elijah around (I Ki. 18:12).  But what had happened was a miracle, it didn’t need to grow!

When the high priest said that the apostles had “filled Jerusalem” with their doctrine (Acts 5:27,28), that wasn’t true.  Sure, 3,000 men got saved the first day and 5,000 men the next day, but even counting their families, that was only a fraction of the estimated 600,000 people living in Jerusalem at that time.  If they had filled Jerusalem with their doctrine, they would have moved on to spread the gospel to the rest of the world as the Lord told them (Lu. 24:47; Acts 1:8).The high priest only said that to get people to overreact (cf. Jo. 12:19).

The high priest was also wrong when he said the apostles were trying to bring the Lord’s blood on them, even though they said they were willing to bear responsibility for it (Mt. 27:3,4).  The apostles had reduced the charge against them from murder to manslaughter (Acts 3:17), so weren’t.

Video of this message is available on YouTube: The Anger of Israel’s Religious Leaders – Acts 5:17-28

The Rarity of Charity

“…speak thou the things which become sound doctrine: That the aged men be… sound in… charity” (Titus 2:1,2).

To adorn the sound doctrine that they profess to believe, the Apostle Paul instructed Titus to tell aged men to be sound in charity.  To guide them in this, Paul gives a detailed description of charity in I Corinthians 13:4-7 that serves as a good guide for Christians of all ages.  Newer Bibles change “charity” to love here, but charity is love in action, and that’s the kind of charity that all Christians should seek to be sound in!  But Paul counsels aged men to be sound in charity because some of the descriptions he gave the Corinthians of charity are harder for aged men to exhibit.

For instance, he says that charity “suffereth long” (I Cor. 13:4).  Do you know any aged men who don’t suffer long with others, who get cranky when people vex them instead?  Paul says aged men should rather be sound in charity, and “kind” (v. 4) when people tax their longsuffering.

Charity also “envieth not” (I Cor. 13:4).  People of all ages are envious, but envy hurts more as you get older.  You see, if you spend your life envying the things possessed by others, and not getting them, by the time you get old you realize you’re probably never going to get them.  No wonder Paul tells aged men they should be sound in charity instead of being envious.

Paul also says charity “is not puffed up” (I Cor. 13:4).  That’s a reference to pride caused by too much knowledge (I Cor. 8;1).  And who has more knowledge than aged men?  If you don’t believe that, just ask one!  But I’ve known older Christian men who were puffed up by their knowledge of the Bible, and that’s not very becoming to sound doctrine.

Charity also doesn’t “behave itself unseemly” (I Cor. 13:5), a word that means inappropriately, or even indecently.  The only other time the Bible uses this term is to describe homosexuality (Rom. 1:27).  But homosexuality isn’t the only way to behave unseemly.  You’ve probably heard the term “dirty old man.”  That’s an old man who acts inappropriately toward women.

A few years ago, one of our former presidents was accused of acting unseemly, touching women inappropriately while taking photographs with them.  If those accusations were true, he perhaps thought it was innocent because he was so elderly.  But that is not a fitting way for a former president to act, and it is surely no way for an aged Christian man to act.  Aged men should be sound in charity instead, and charity “doth not behave itself unseemly.”

Paul also wrote that charity “believeth all things” (I Cor. 13:7). That means when something happens that makes you question the integrity of a brother in Christ, don’t be so quick to believe something bad about him.  Believe “all things” good about him until you get all the facts.

A man who used to attend the church that I pastor once said to me, “Maybe you’ve noticed that I never put anything in the offering box.  That’s because I’m getting over a gambling addiction and I’m paying off all my old gambling debts.”  I told him I didn’t make a habit of watching to see who visits our offering box, but even if I noticed that he didn’t, I wouldn’t assume he was unspiritual.  I’d give him the benefit of the doubt and believe the best about him.

Now that gets harder as we get older and more cynical.  The longer you live, the more you see the bad side of people, so you tend to believe the worst about them.  One of my assistant pastors is a former Chicago police lieutenant, and he says it is harder for some policemen to think the best of people, for they spend their lives seeing people at their absolute worst.  Because of that, they end up getting cynical about people at a much younger age than the rest of us.  But if aged men want to be sound in charity, they have to be willing to believe the best of others.

If we could all live that way, maybe the rarity of charity would become a thing of the past!


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.


The Fear of God – Acts 5:11-16

Summary:

When Peter struck some unbelievers dead (5:1-10), why’d fear fall on the church (v.11)?  They hadn’t lied to Peter.  And why’s Paul say that we should fear God (II Cor. 7:1; Eph. 5:21; Phil. 2:12).  Well, the psalmist said that God forgives us so we’ll fear Him (Ps. 130:3,4).  Here it helps to know that the word “fear” can mean reverence (Ps. 89:7), which means respect—the kind we should always give God.

Jews in the kingdom will fear God’s goodness (Hos. 3:4,5) because they’ll think about the “many days” they spent rejecting God before the kingdom begins, and what would have happened to them had they died before returning to Him.  It’s one reason we should fear God too!

We today can’t do miracles of healing like the apostles did here (Acts 5:12) because the Jews require a sign by nature (I Cor. 1:22).  That’s because they stem from the miraculous birth of Isaac!  God also taught them to look for such signs (Ex. 4:1-4).  But salvation was of the Jews back then (Jo. 4:22), and God was using them to reach the Gentiles.

But God isn’t giving the Jews miracles any more to get them to believe and then reach the Gentiles.  In the dispensation of grace, He’s giving the Gentiles “wisdom,” so that they can reach the Jews.  That’s because Gentiles seek wisdom by nature just like Jews seek miracles by nature (I Cor. 1:22b).  And God is abounding toward us in wisdom (Eph. 1:8) just like He abounded toward the Jews in miracles (Acts 5:12).

Solomon is mentioned again (5:12 cf. 3:11) because they were looking for the kingdom, the kingdom that would be a restoration of what the kingdom of Israel was like under Solomon (Acts 1:6) when Israel was at the height of her power and influence. But hanging around the Jewish temple proves the 12 weren’t starting the Gentile church of today.

You’d think they wouldn’t be “of one accord” (5:12) after Peter struck two Jews dead (cf. Num.16:41), but they were filled with the Spirit here (Acts 2:4) and made to live “of one heart and of one soul” (4:32) even when that happened.

Mention of the “rest” who didn’t dare join the church (Acts 5:13) shows that Satan was filling the hearts of a bunch of men to try to infiltrate God’s church (cf. Acts 5:3).  They were planning to infiltrate the church so they could lead them astray as the Lord warned (Mt. 7:15).  This is still a danger even under grace (Acts 20:28,29), a great danger (v. 31).  The only way to guard against it is to be built up in grace (v. 32).

The Jews at Pentecost were right to magnify the twelve apostles (5:13), but we’re supposed to magnify Paul, as he himself did (Rom. 11:13).  If you magnify the twelve instead, you’ll probably expect the kind of results they got (Acts 5:14), and we don’t see results like that today.

Pastors like to say that we could if we were as faithful as they were, but God predicted their growth (Isa. 44:3,4).  You see, He planned to plant them in the earth to get the “city” of Jerusalem to believe (Ps. 72:16), and then use them to reach the world (Zech. 10:8,9 cf. Mark 4:30,31).  He planned to make that tiny group of 120 disciples (Acts 1:15) into the greatest kingdom on earth (Mark 4:32).

So don’t be discouraged that we don’t see “multitudes” getting saved in one day like the apostles did.  God’s not starting the kingdom today like He was then!  They were simply in the right place at the right time.

Our dispensation will end with a departure from the truth, not growth (I Tim. 4:1).  “Some” there probably means most (cf. Heb. 3:16).  So what should we do about it?  Paul told Timothy to take heed to himself and the doctrine (I Tim. 4:16) and so should we!

Peter’s shadow healing (Acts 5:15,16) fulfilled John 14:12, a taste of the kingdom (Isa. 32:1-3).  Jews were always trusting in the wrong shadow (Isai 30:1,2), and someday will trust in Antichrist’s healing shadow as well (Judges 9:15 cf. II Thes. 2:8,9).

If modern “healers” can’t heal “every one” like Peter could (Acts 5:16), they must not have a God-given gift of healing like Peter did, because God can heal all diseases!

Video of this message is available on YouTube: The Fear of God – Acts 5:11-16